PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REGL vs. VOE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REGL vs. VOE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than VOE's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, REGL has underperformed VOE with an annualized return of 9.12%, while VOE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.


REGL

1D
-0.58%
1M
-2.06%
YTD
3.98%
6M
4.90%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
10.42%
5Y*
5.92%
10Y*
9.12%

VOE

1D
-0.16%
1M
1.35%
YTD
10.75%
6M
11.62%
1Y
22.73%
3Y*
16.53%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
10.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGL vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
3.98%6.89%12.26%5.41%-0.62%20.38%7.50%18.79%-3.25%10.17%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
10.75%12.08%14.00%9.85%-7.97%28.78%2.65%27.85%-12.48%17.07%

Correlation

The correlation between REGL and VOE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2015

0.89

The correlation between REGL and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

REGL vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REGL
VOE

Financial Services

30.0%
16.5%

Industrials

15.1%
14.0%

Utilities

14.5%
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
5.7%

Basic Materials

9.3%
5.8%

Real Estate

7.8%
6.0%

Healthcare

4.5%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

3.8%
7.9%

Energy

3.4%
12.8%

Technology

2.0%
10.9%

Communication Services

-

2.2%

Financial Services

REGL
30.0%
VOE
16.5%

Industrials

REGL
15.1%
VOE
14.0%

Utilities

REGL
14.5%
VOE
12.1%

Consumer Cyclical

REGL
9.6%
VOE
5.7%

Basic Materials

REGL
9.3%
VOE
5.8%

Real Estate

REGL
7.8%
VOE
6.0%

Healthcare

REGL
4.5%
VOE
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

REGL
3.8%
VOE
7.9%

Energy

REGL
3.4%
VOE
12.8%

Technology

REGL
2.0%
VOE
10.9%

Communication Services

REGL

-

VOE
2.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REGL vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGL
REGL Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

VOE
VOE Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VOE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VOE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
VOE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
VOE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
VOE Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGL vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


REGLVOEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.35

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

3.30

-2.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

12.51

-9.43

REGL vs. VOE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGL Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the VOE Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGL and VOE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


REGLVOEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.99

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

0.53

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.56

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.44

+0.08

Drawdowns

REGL vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, smaller than the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and VOE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGLVOEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.37%

-61.50%

+25.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-6.93%

-2.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

-18.45%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

-19.70%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.37%

-43.18%

+6.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.82%

-0.16%

-5.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.08%

-8.35%

+4.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

1.82%

+1.20%

Volatility

REGL vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 2.58%. This indicates that REGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGLVOEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

2.58%

+1.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.23%

8.13%

+1.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.22%

11.47%

+1.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.11%

16.03%

+0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

18.83%

-0.50%

REGL vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

REGL vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison

REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than VOE's 1.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.24%2.32%2.28%2.40%2.32%2.50%2.41%1.96%2.09%1.63%1.20%1.66%
VOE
Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.88%2.10%2.11%2.27%2.27%1.78%2.36%2.05%2.75%1.86%1.92%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


REGL and VOE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REGL has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to VOE (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs VOE's -61.50%.

On 10-year performance, VOE leads with 10.55% vs 9.12% for REGL. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VOE has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VOE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.

REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.88% for VOE.

REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.07% for VOE.

VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REGL and VOE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer