REGL vs. VOE
REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and VOE (Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - REGL tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index while VOE tracks the CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REGL returned 9.12%/yr vs 10.55%/yr for VOE. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REGL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for VOE.
Performance
REGL vs. VOE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 3.98% return, which is significantly lower than VOE's 10.75% return. Over the past 10 years, REGL has underperformed VOE with an annualized return of 9.12%, while VOE has yielded a comparatively higher 10.55% annualized return.
REGL
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 3.98%
- 6M
- 4.90%
- 1Y
- 9.25%
- 3Y*
- 10.42%
- 5Y*
- 5.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.12%
VOE
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- YTD
- 10.75%
- 6M
- 11.62%
- 1Y
- 22.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.53%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- 10.55%
REGL vs. VOE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 3.98% | 6.89% | 12.26% | 5.41% | -0.62% | 20.38% | 7.50% | 18.79% | -3.25% | 10.17% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 10.75% | 12.08% | 14.00% | 9.85% | -7.97% | 28.78% | 2.65% | 27.85% | -12.48% | 17.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGL and VOE is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 6, 2015 | 0.89 |
The correlation between REGL and VOE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.
REGL vs. VOE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REGL
VOE
Financial Services
Industrials
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Healthcare
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Technology
Communication Services
-
Financial Services
REGL
VOE
Industrials
REGL
VOE
Utilities
REGL
VOE
Consumer Cyclical
REGL
VOE
Basic Materials
REGL
VOE
Real Estate
REGL
VOE
Healthcare
REGL
VOE
Consumer Defensive
REGL
VOE
Energy
REGL
VOE
Technology
REGL
VOE
Communication Services
REGL
-
VOE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGL vs. VOE — Risk / Return Rank
REGL
VOE
REGL vs. VOE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| REGL | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 3.30 | -2.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.07 | 12.51 | -9.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| REGL | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 | 1.99 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.53 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | 0.56 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | 0.44 | +0.08 |
Drawdowns
REGL vs. VOE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, smaller than the maximum VOE drawdown of -61.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and VOE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGL | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.37% | -61.50% | +25.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -6.93% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.96% | -18.45% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | -19.70% | +2.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.37% | -43.18% | +6.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.82% | -0.16% | -5.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.08% | -8.35% | +4.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 1.82% | +1.20% |
Volatility
REGL vs. VOE - Volatility Comparison
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF (VOE) at 2.58%. This indicates that REGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGL | VOE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.65% | 2.58% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.23% | 8.13% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.22% | 11.47% | +1.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 16.03% | +0.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 18.83% | -0.50% |
REGL vs. VOE - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VOE's 0.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
REGL vs. VOE - Dividend Comparison
REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, more than VOE's 1.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.24% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
VOE Vanguard Mid-Cap Value ETF | 1.88% | 2.10% | 2.11% | 2.27% | 2.27% | 1.78% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 2.75% | 1.86% | 1.92% | 2.05% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REGL and VOE have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REGL has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to VOE (2.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs VOE's -61.50%.
On 10-year performance, VOE leads with 10.55% vs 9.12% for REGL. On fees, VOE is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, VOE has been the lower-risk option at 2.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VOE has performed better with a 10.55% return vs 9.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VOE is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.
REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.24%, compared with 1.88% for VOE.
REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while VOE tracks CRSP US Mid Cap Value Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.07% for VOE.
VOE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REGL and VOE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer