PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REGL vs. CALF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REGL vs. CALF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly lower than CALF's 22.50% return.


REGL

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.53%
6M
7.57%
YTD
12.54%
1Y
17.58%
3Y*
11.47%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
9.70%
ALL TIME*
10.00%

CALF

1D
-0.40%
1M
4.89%
6M
19.77%
YTD
22.50%
1Y
39.59%
3Y*
8.57%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$20.38M$24.48M$25.33M
$11.86M$8.77M$5.92M

REGL vs. CALF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
12.54%6.89%12.26%5.41%-0.62%20.38%7.50%18.79%-3.25%4.95%
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF
22.50%2.33%-7.41%35.43%-15.20%40.68%16.55%18.18%-10.06%5.78%

Correlation

The correlation between REGL and CALF is 0.61, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2017

0.78

The correlation between REGL and CALF shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.78 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REGL vs. CALF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REGL
CALF

Financial Services

32.0%
0.2%

Industrials

15.5%
9.3%

Utilities

13.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
23.2%

Basic Materials

8.7%
4.2%

Real Estate

7.6%
1.8%

Healthcare

4.6%
11.6%

Energy

3.1%
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
5.3%

Technology

1.7%
23.4%

Communication Services

-

7.6%

Financial Services

REGL
32.0%
CALF
0.2%

Industrials

REGL
15.5%
CALF
9.3%

Utilities

REGL
13.4%
CALF

-

Consumer Cyclical

REGL
10.7%
CALF
23.2%

Basic Materials

REGL
8.7%
CALF
4.2%

Real Estate

REGL
7.6%
CALF
1.8%

Healthcare

REGL
4.6%
CALF
11.6%

Energy

REGL
3.1%
CALF
13.7%

Consumer Defensive

REGL
2.6%
CALF
5.3%

Technology

REGL
1.7%
CALF
23.4%

Communication Services

REGL

-

CALF
7.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REGL vs. CALF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REGL
REGL Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

CALF
CALF Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CALF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CALF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CALF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
CALF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CALF Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REGL vs. CALF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGLCALFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.40

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

6.13

-4.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.31

17.68

-12.38

REGL vs. CALF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the CALF Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGL and CALF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REGL vs. CALF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, smaller than the maximum CALF drawdown of -47.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and CALF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGLCALFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.37%

-47.58%

+11.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-6.02%

-3.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

-34.22%

+17.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

-34.22%

+17.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-1.88%

-0.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-10.57%

+6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.09%

+1.00%

Volatility

REGL vs. CALF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) is 4.14%, while Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF (CALF) has a volatility of 5.09%. This indicates that REGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CALF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGLCALFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

5.09%

-0.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

11.64%

-2.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

16.13%

-3.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

23.23%

-7.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

25.89%

-7.58%

REGL vs. CALF - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CALF's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

REGL vs. CALF - Dividend Comparison

REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, more than CALF's 1.12% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CALF
Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows ETF
1.12%1.43%1.07%1.18%0.85%2.63%0.82%0.99%1.39%0.70%0.00%0.00%
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.17%2.32%2.28%2.40%2.32%2.50%2.41%1.96%2.09%1.63%1.20%1.66%

Frequently Asked Questions


REGL and CALF have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CALF has higher volatility (5.09%) compared to REGL (4.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs CALF's -47.58%.

On 5-year performance, REGL leads with 8.17% vs 6.29% for CALF. On fees, REGL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 4.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, REGL has performed better with a 8.17% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

REGL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for CALF.

REGL has the higher dividend yield at 2.17%, compared with 1.12% for CALF.

REGL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while CALF is Small Cap Value Equities. REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while CALF tracks Pacer US Small Cap Cash Cows Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.59% for CALF.

CALF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REGL and CALF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer