REGL vs. TMDV

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and TMDV (ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds from ProShares - REGL tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index while TMDV tracks the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, REGL returned 7.41%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for TMDV. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. REGL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for TMDV.

Performance

REGL vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with REGL having a 8.22% return and TMDV slightly higher at 8.42%.

REGL

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 1.92%
• YTD: 8.22%
• 6M: 6.56%
• 1Y: 13.68%
• 3Y*: 12.57%
• 5Y*: 7.41%
• 10Y*: 9.68%

TMDV

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: 2.61%
• YTD: 8.42%
• 6M: 7.91%
• 1Y: 10.94%
• 3Y*: 6.24%
• 5Y*: 3.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REGL vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	8.22%	6.89%	12.26%	5.41%	-0.62%	20.38%	7.50%	1.97%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	8.42%	2.91%	2.64%	2.25%	-5.10%	23.45%	4.82%	2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between REGL and TMDV is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.90
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019	0.93

The correlation between REGL and TMDV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

REGL vs. TMDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	REGL	TMDV
Financial Services	31.0%	16.1%
Industrials	15.2%	16.0%
Utilities	13.7%	12.2%
Consumer Cyclical	10.7%	5.5%
Basic Materials	9.2%	12.2%
Real Estate	7.8%	4.8%
Healthcare	4.6%	5.4%
Energy	3.1%	2.8%
Consumer Defensive	2.8%	23.5%
Technology	1.9%	1.6%
Communication Services	-	-

Return for Risk

REGL vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REGL

REGL Risk / Return Rank: 30
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 28
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 32

TMDV

TMDV Risk / Return Rank: 25
TMDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
TMDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
TMDV Omega Ratio Rank: 24
TMDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
TMDV Martin Ratio Rank: 23

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REGL vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REGL	TMDV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	0.91	+0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	1.42	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.16	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	1.12	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.41	2.70	+1.72

REGL vs. TMDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is comparable to the TMDV Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGL and TMDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

REGL vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, which is greater than TMDV's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and TMDV.

Drawdown Indicators

	REGL	TMDV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.37%	-33.42%	-2.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.67%	-9.82%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.96%	-16.02%	-0.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.96%	-17.11%	+0.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-36.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.97%	-3.09%	+1.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.08%	-5.42%	+1.34%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.11%	4.07%	-0.96%

Volatility

REGL vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) at 3.26%. This indicates that REGL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REGL	TMDV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.57%	3.26%	+0.31%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.31%	8.63%	+0.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.24%	12.20%	+1.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.06%	14.41%	+1.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.32%	18.60%	-0.28%

REGL vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

REGL vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison

REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%, less than TMDV's 2.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF	2.15%	2.32%	2.28%	2.40%	2.32%	2.50%	2.41%	1.96%	2.09%	1.63%	1.20%	1.66%
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF	2.53%	2.65%	2.70%	2.45%	2.46%	2.14%	2.28%	0.16%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REGL and TMDV in my portfolio?

REGL and TMDV have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REGL or TMDV?

REGL has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to TMDV (3.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs TMDV's -33.42%.

Which ETF is better, REGL or TMDV?

On 5-year performance, REGL leads with 7.41% vs 3.80% for TMDV. On fees, TMDV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TMDV has been the lower-risk option at 3.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, REGL or TMDV?

Over the 5-year period, REGL has performed better with a 7.41% return vs 3.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, REGL or TMDV?

TMDV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, REGL or TMDV?

TMDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 2.15% for REGL.

What is the main difference between REGL and TMDV?

REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while TMDV tracks Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.35% for TMDV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

REGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.