PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REGL vs. SCHD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REGL vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 12.54% return, which is significantly lower than SCHD's 24.03% return. Over the past 10 years, REGL has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 9.70%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.76% annualized return.


REGL

1D
-0.09%
1M
1.53%
6M
7.57%
YTD
12.54%
1Y
17.58%
3Y*
11.47%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
9.70%
ALL TIME*
10.00%

SCHD

1D
0.18%
1M
3.33%
6M
14.09%
YTD
24.03%
1Y
31.54%
3Y*
14.19%
5Y*
9.54%
10Y*
12.76%
ALL TIME*
13.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$11.86M$8.77M$5.92M
$786.88M$715.86M$685.58M

REGL vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
12.54%6.89%12.26%5.41%-0.62%20.38%7.50%18.79%-3.25%10.17%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
24.03%4.34%11.66%4.54%-3.26%29.87%15.03%27.29%-5.56%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between REGL and SCHD is 0.71, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015

0.82

The correlation between REGL and SCHD shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

REGL vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
REGL
SCHD

Financial Services

32.0%
9.9%

Industrials

15.5%
7.8%

Utilities

13.4%
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

10.7%
7.7%

Basic Materials

8.7%
1.2%

Real Estate

7.6%

-

Healthcare

4.6%
20.8%

Energy

3.1%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
20.6%

Technology

1.7%
12.7%

Communication Services

-

6.2%

Financial Services

REGL
32.0%
SCHD
9.9%

Industrials

REGL
15.5%
SCHD
7.8%

Utilities

REGL
13.4%
SCHD
0.1%

Consumer Cyclical

REGL
10.7%
SCHD
7.7%

Basic Materials

REGL
8.7%
SCHD
1.2%

Real Estate

REGL
7.6%
SCHD

-

Healthcare

REGL
4.6%
SCHD
20.8%

Energy

REGL
3.1%
SCHD
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

REGL
2.6%
SCHD
20.6%

Technology

REGL
1.7%
SCHD
12.7%

Communication Services

REGL

-

SCHD
6.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REGL vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

REGL
REGL Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
REGL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGL Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
REGL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGL Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHD
SCHD Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SCHD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

REGL vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGLSCHDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.51

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

6.74

-5.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.31

17.01

-11.71

REGL vs. SCHD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REGL Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the SCHD Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REGL and SCHD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REGL vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and SCHD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGLSCHDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.37%

-33.37%

-3.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

-4.61%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.96%

-16.13%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.96%

-16.85%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.37%

-33.37%

-3.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.92%

-1.24%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.05%

-3.30%

-0.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

1.82%

+1.27%

Volatility

REGL vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) have volatilities of 4.14% and 4.11%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGLSCHDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

4.11%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.52%

8.11%

+1.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.12%

11.13%

+1.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.03%

14.39%

+1.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.31%

16.72%

+1.59%

REGL vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison

REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

REGL vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison

REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than SCHD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
REGL
ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
2.17%2.32%2.28%2.40%2.32%2.50%2.41%1.96%2.09%1.63%1.20%1.66%
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
3.13%3.82%3.64%3.49%3.39%2.78%3.16%2.98%3.06%2.63%2.89%2.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


REGL and SCHD have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

REGL has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to SCHD (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs SCHD's -33.37%.

On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.76% vs 9.70% for REGL. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 9.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for REGL.

SCHD has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.17% for REGL.

REGL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.06% for SCHD.

SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REGL and SCHD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer