REGL vs. SQQQ
REGL (ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both exchange-traded funds - REGL is a Mid Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SQQQ is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REGL returned 9.34%/yr vs -55.43%/yr for SQQQ. At a correlation of -0.49, they often move in opposite directions. REGL charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SQQQ.
Performance
REGL vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REGL achieves a 10.33% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -42.24% return. Over the past 10 years, REGL has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of 9.34%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.43% annualized return.
REGL
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 6.64%
- YTD
- 10.33%
- 1Y
- 12.11%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 7.77%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
SQQQ
- 1D
- -3.30%
- 1M
- -1.98%
- 6M
- -38.99%
- YTD
- -42.24%
- 1Y
- -57.13%
- 3Y*
- -52.32%
- 5Y*
- -46.24%
- 10Y*
- -55.43%
REGL vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 10.33% | 6.89% | 12.26% | 5.41% | -0.62% | 20.38% | 7.50% | 18.79% | -3.25% | 10.17% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -42.24% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between REGL and SQQQ is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2015 | -0.49 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between REGL and SQQQ has weakened: their correlation has moved from -0.49 to -0.18, meaning they move in opposite directions less often than they have historically.
REGL vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
REGL
SQQQ
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
-
Energy
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
-
Financial Services
REGL
SQQQ
Industrials
REGL
SQQQ
-
Utilities
REGL
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
REGL
SQQQ
-
Basic Materials
REGL
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
REGL
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
REGL
SQQQ
-
Energy
REGL
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
REGL
SQQQ
-
Technology
REGL
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
REGL
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REGL vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
REGL
SQQQ
REGL vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REGL | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 0.81 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.26 | -0.94 | +2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.91 | -1.73 | +5.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REGL vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REGL drawdown since its inception was -36.37%, smaller than the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REGL and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REGL | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.37% | -100.00% | +63.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.67% | -61.03% | +51.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.96% | -92.51% | +75.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.96% | -97.27% | +80.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.37% | -99.97% | +63.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -100.00% | +99.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.06% | -92.75% | +88.69% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.11% | 32.98% | -29.87% |
Volatility
REGL vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF (REGL) is 3.43%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 24.18%. This indicates that REGL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REGL | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.43% | 24.18% | -20.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.32% | 45.91% | -36.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.08% | 55.61% | -42.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.04% | 67.89% | -51.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.29% | 66.57% | -48.28% |
REGL vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
REGL has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
REGL vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
REGL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.21%, less than SQQQ's 10.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REGL ProShares S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats ETF | 2.21% | 2.32% | 2.28% | 2.40% | 2.32% | 2.50% | 2.41% | 1.96% | 2.09% | 1.63% | 1.20% | 1.66% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 10.34% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REGL and SQQQ have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (24.18%) compared to REGL (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REGL dropped -36.37% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, REGL leads with 9.34% vs -55.43% for SQQQ. On fees, REGL is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, REGL has been the lower-risk option at 3.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, REGL has performed better with a 9.34% return vs -55.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REGL is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SQQQ.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.34%, compared with 2.21% for REGL.
REGL is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while SQQQ is Leveraged Equities. REGL tracks S&P MidCap 400 Dividend Aristocrats Index, while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 0.40% for REGL and 0.95% for SQQQ.
REGL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REGL and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer