PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
REG vs. NIXT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

REG vs. NIXT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 18.54% return, which is significantly lower than NIXT's 20.40% return.


REG

1D
0.43%
1M
6.55%
YTD
18.54%
6M
22.12%
1Y
18.96%
3Y*
14.45%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
4.12%

NIXT

1D
0.85%
1M
4.68%
YTD
20.40%
6M
17.28%
1Y
35.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REG vs. NIXT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
18.54%-2.78%1.16%
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
20.40%4.94%4.60%

Correlation

The correlation between REG and NIXT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.31

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

REG vs. NIXT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REG
REG Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
REG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
REG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
REG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
REG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

NIXT
NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REG vs. NIXT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


REGNIXTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.76

-0.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

9.35

-4.08

REG vs. NIXT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REG Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the NIXT Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REG and NIXT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

REG vs. NIXT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, which is greater than NIXT's maximum drawdown of -27.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and NIXT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


REGNIXTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.37%

-27.75%

-45.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.17%

-11.71%

+3.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.62%

+0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.17%

-5.89%

-10.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.35%

3.46%

-0.11%

Volatility

REG vs. NIXT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is 4.45%, while Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a volatility of 5.32%. This indicates that REG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NIXT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


REGNIXTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.45%

5.32%

-0.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.10%

14.26%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.90%

21.30%

-5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.39%

23.23%

-0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.88%

23.23%

+6.65%

Dividends

REG vs. NIXT - Dividend Comparison

REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, more than NIXT's 1.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
1.33%1.64%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
REG
Regency Centers Corporation
3.70%4.16%3.67%3.91%4.04%3.20%5.22%3.71%3.78%3.04%2.90%2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions


REG and NIXT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NIXT has higher volatility (5.32%) compared to REG (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REG dropped -73.37% vs NIXT's -27.75%.

NIXT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for REG and NIXT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer