PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
NIXT vs. VTI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

NIXT vs. VTI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NIXT achieves a 20.11% return, which is significantly higher than VTI's 12.01% return.


NIXT

1D
-0.87%
1M
2.57%
YTD
20.11%
6M
20.80%
1Y
38.27%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

VTI

1D
0.26%
1M
5.37%
YTD
12.01%
6M
12.40%
1Y
30.01%
3Y*
22.37%
5Y*
13.05%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

NIXT vs. VTI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
20.11%4.94%4.89%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
12.01%17.10%7.88%

Correlation

The correlation between NIXT and VTI is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2024

0.78

The correlation between NIXT and VTI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

NIXT vs. VTI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NIXT
NIXT Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
NIXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NIXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
NIXT Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
NIXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
NIXT Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

VTI
VTI Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
VTI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VTI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTI Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NIXT vs. VTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) and Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


NIXTVTIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.82

2.48

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.62

3.37

-0.76

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.45

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

3.44

-0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.83

15.88

-5.05

NIXT vs. VTI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NIXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the VTI Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NIXT and VTI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


NIXTVTIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.82

2.48

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

0.51

+0.25

Drawdowns

NIXT vs. VTI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NIXT drawdown since its inception was -27.75%, smaller than the maximum VTI drawdown of -55.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NIXT and VTI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


NIXTVTIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.75%

-55.45%

+27.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.71%

-8.92%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

0.00%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.97%

-8.03%

+2.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.46%

1.93%

+1.53%

Volatility

NIXT vs. VTI - Volatility Comparison

Research Affiliates Deletions ETF (NIXT) has a higher volatility of 4.78% compared to Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF (VTI) at 2.86%. This indicates that NIXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VTI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


NIXTVTIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

2.86%

+1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.99%

9.11%

+4.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.19%

12.15%

+9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.30%

17.40%

+5.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.30%

18.30%

+5.00%

NIXT vs. VTI - Expense Ratio Comparison

NIXT has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than VTI's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

NIXT vs. VTI - Dividend Comparison

NIXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than VTI's 1.01% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NIXT
Research Affiliates Deletions ETF
1.33%1.64%1.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VTI
Vanguard Total Stock Market ETF
1.01%1.12%1.27%1.44%1.66%1.21%1.42%1.78%2.04%1.71%1.92%1.98%

Frequently Asked Questions


NIXT and VTI have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NIXT has higher volatility (4.78%) compared to VTI (2.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NIXT dropped -27.75% vs VTI's -55.45%.

On 1-year performance, NIXT leads with 38.27% vs 30.01% for VTI. On fees, VTI is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, VTI has been the lower-risk option at 2.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, NIXT has performed better with a 38.27% return vs 30.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VTI is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for NIXT.

NIXT has the higher dividend yield at 1.33%, compared with 1.01% for VTI.

NIXT is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while VTI is Large Cap Blend Equities. NIXT tracks Research Affiliates Deletions Index, while VTI tracks CRSP US Total Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Research Affiliates and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for NIXT and 0.03% for VTI.

VTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for NIXT and VTI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer