REG vs. FLDR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

REG (Regency Centers Corporation) is a stock, while FLDR (Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF) is Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. Over the past 5 years, REG returned 7.74%/yr vs 3.70%/yr for FLDR. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

REG vs. FLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 18.54% return, which is significantly higher than FLDR's 1.58% return.

REG

• 1D: 0.43%
• 1M: 6.55%
• YTD: 18.54%
• 6M: 22.12%
• 1Y: 18.96%
• 3Y*: 14.45%
• 5Y*: 7.74%
• 10Y*: 4.12%

FLDR

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.88%
• 1Y: 4.76%
• 3Y*: 5.36%
• 5Y*: 3.70%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

REG vs. FLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
REG Regency Centers Corporation	18.54%	-2.78%	14.90%	11.85%	-13.59%	71.41%	-23.86%	11.43%	0.58%
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF	1.58%	5.41%	5.71%	6.32%	-0.33%	-0.18%	2.01%	4.52%	0.84%

Correlation

The correlation between REG and FLDR is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2018	0.08

The correlation between REG and FLDR shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (all time) to 0.22 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

REG vs. FLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

REG

REG Risk / Return Rank: 74
REG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
REG Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
REG Omega Ratio Rank: 68
REG Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
REG Martin Ratio Rank: 78

FLDR

FLDR Risk / Return Rank: 98
FLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
FLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
FLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 99
FLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

REG vs. FLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	REG	FLDR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.11	5.90	-4.79
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	9.99	-8.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	2.73	-1.53
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	10.19	-8.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.27	69.63	-64.36

REG vs. FLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current REG Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is lower than the FLDR Sharpe Ratio of 5.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of REG and FLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

REG vs. FLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, which is greater than FLDR's maximum drawdown of -12.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and FLDR.

Drawdown Indicators

	REG	FLDR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.37%	-12.23%	-61.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.17%	-0.47%	-7.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.10%	-0.76%	-14.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.09%	-2.33%	-27.76%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.02%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.10%	0.00%	-0.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.17%	-0.35%	-15.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	0.07%	+3.28%

Volatility

REG vs. FLDR - Volatility Comparison

Regency Centers Corporation (REG) has a higher volatility of 4.45% compared to Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) at 0.20%. This indicates that REG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLDR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	REG	FLDR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.45%	0.20%	+4.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.10%	0.59%	+10.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.90%	0.81%	+15.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.39%	1.21%	+21.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.88%	5.25%	+24.63%

Dividends

REG vs. FLDR - Dividend Comparison

REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, less than FLDR's 4.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF	4.42%	4.66%	5.50%	5.28%	2.09%	0.51%	1.22%	2.69%	1.38%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
REG Regency Centers Corporation	3.70%	4.16%	3.67%	3.91%	4.04%	3.20%	5.22%	3.71%	3.78%	3.04%	2.90%	2.85%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both REG and FLDR in my portfolio?

REG and FLDR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, REG or FLDR?

REG has higher volatility (4.45%) compared to FLDR (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REG dropped -73.37% vs FLDR's -12.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.90 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.