FLDR vs. BSV
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV).
FLDR and BSV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FLDR is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Low Duration Investment Grade Factor Index. It was launched on Jun 12, 2018. BSV is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. 1-5 Year Government/Credit Float Adjusted Index. It was launched on Apr 3, 2007. Both FLDR and BSV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FLDR or BSV.
Correlation
The correlation between FLDR and BSV is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FLDR vs. BSV - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FLDR:
5.32
BSV:
2.82
FLDR:
9.41
BSV:
4.41
FLDR:
2.43
BSV:
1.58
FLDR:
17.39
BSV:
2.21
FLDR:
89.36
BSV:
10.32
FLDR:
0.07%
BSV:
0.62%
FLDR:
1.11%
BSV:
2.29%
FLDR:
-12.23%
BSV:
-8.62%
FLDR:
-0.22%
BSV:
0.00%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FLDR achieves a 1.47% return, which is significantly lower than BSV's 2.48% return.
FLDR
1.47%
0.26%
2.28%
5.80%
3.39%
N/A
BSV
2.48%
1.11%
2.40%
6.51%
1.31%
1.76%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FLDR vs. BSV - Expense Ratio Comparison
FLDR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than BSV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FLDR vs. BSV — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FLDR
BSV
FLDR vs. BSV - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) and Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FLDR vs. BSV - Dividend Comparison
FLDR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.27%, more than BSV's 3.50% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLDR Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF | 5.27% | 5.50% | 5.28% | 2.09% | 0.51% | 1.22% | 2.69% | 1.38% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BSV Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF | 3.50% | 3.38% | 2.46% | 1.50% | 1.36% | 1.79% | 2.29% | 1.99% | 1.65% | 1.49% | 1.40% | 1.45% |
Drawdowns
FLDR vs. BSV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FLDR drawdown since its inception was -12.23%, which is greater than BSV's maximum drawdown of -8.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FLDR and BSV. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FLDR vs. BSV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Low Duration Bond Factor ETF (FLDR) is 0.33%, while Vanguard Short-Term Bond ETF (BSV) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that FLDR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BSV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.