REG vs. FBTC
REG (Regency Centers Corporation) is a stock, while FBTC (Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund) is Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Bitcoin Reference Rate. Over the past year, REG returned 18.96% vs -39.70% for FBTC. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
REG vs. FBTC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REG achieves a 18.54% return, which is significantly higher than FBTC's -27.39% return.
REG
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 6.55%
- YTD
- 18.54%
- 6M
- 22.12%
- 1Y
- 18.96%
- 3Y*
- 14.45%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 4.12%
FBTC
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- -19.60%
- YTD
- -27.39%
- 6M
- -29.64%
- 1Y
- -39.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
REG vs. FBTC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 18.54% | -2.78% | 19.42% |
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | -27.39% | -6.56% | 94.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between REG and FBTC is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024 | 0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REG vs. FBTC — Risk / Return Rank
REG
FBTC
REG vs. FBTC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) and Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REG | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 0.85 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | -0.78 | +2.95 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | -1.37 | +6.64 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REG vs. FBTC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REG drawdown since its inception was -73.37%, which is greater than FBTC's maximum drawdown of -52.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REG and FBTC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REG | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.37% | -52.07% | -21.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.17% | -52.07% | +43.90% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.10% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.09% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -49.42% | +49.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.17% | -16.46% | +0.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 29.61% | -26.26% |
Volatility
REG vs. FBTC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Regency Centers Corporation (REG) is 4.45%, while Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) has a volatility of 11.97%. This indicates that REG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FBTC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REG | FBTC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.45% | 11.97% | -7.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.10% | 34.39% | -23.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.90% | 43.98% | -28.08% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.39% | 50.13% | -27.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.88% | 50.13% | -20.25% |
Dividends
REG vs. FBTC - Dividend Comparison
REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%, while FBTC has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBTC Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 3.70% | 4.16% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.04% | 3.20% | 5.22% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.90% | 2.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REG and FBTC have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBTC has higher volatility (11.97%) compared to REG (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REG dropped -73.37% vs FBTC's -52.07%.
REG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.11 vs -0.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REG and FBTC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer