REET vs. EFAV
REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) and EFAV (iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - REET is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while EFAV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REET returned 4.03%/yr vs 6.24%/yr for EFAV. A 0.63 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. REET charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for EFAV.
Performance
REET vs. EFAV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 15.40% return, which is significantly higher than EFAV's 7.06% return. Over the past 10 years, REET has underperformed EFAV with an annualized return of 4.03%, while EFAV has yielded a comparatively higher 6.24% annualized return.
REET
- 1D
- -0.25%
- 1M
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 15.40%
- 1Y
- 19.06%
- 3Y*
- 9.68%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- 4.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.97%
EFAV
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 5.68%
- YTD
- 7.06%
- 1Y
- 13.00%
- 3Y*
- 13.16%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 6.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.11%
REET vs. EFAV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 15.40% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | -10.48% | 24.42% | -5.27% | 7.48% |
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF | 7.06% | 26.00% | 5.30% | 12.52% | -15.11% | 7.20% | -0.06% | 16.67% | -5.74% | 22.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between REET and EFAV is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2014 | 0.63 |
The correlation between REET and EFAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REET vs. EFAV — Risk / Return Rank
REET
EFAV
REET vs. EFAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REET | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.22 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 1.96 | +0.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.62 | 4.55 | +3.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REET vs. EFAV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, which is greater than EFAV's maximum drawdown of -27.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and EFAV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REET | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -27.56% | -17.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -6.66% | -2.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -8.75% | -9.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.11% | -27.46% | -4.65% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.59% | -27.56% | -17.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.25% | -2.67% | +2.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.69% | -4.77% | -4.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.86% | -0.35% |
Volatility
REET vs. EFAV - Volatility Comparison
iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF (EFAV) at 2.68%. This indicates that REET's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REET | EFAV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.66% | 2.68% | +0.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.92% | 8.75% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.62% | 10.65% | +1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 11.84% | +5.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 13.02% | +5.82% |
REET vs. EFAV - Expense Ratio Comparison
REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
REET vs. EFAV - Dividend Comparison
REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than EFAV's 3.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAV iShares MSCI EAFE Min Vol Factor ETF | 3.15% | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.08% | 2.53% | 2.47% | 1.33% | 4.19% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 3.94% | 2.49% |
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.26% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
REET and EFAV have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
REET has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to EFAV (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs EFAV's -27.56%.
On 10-year performance, EFAV leads with 6.24% vs 4.03% for REET. On fees, REET is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, EFAV has been the lower-risk option at 2.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EFAV has performed better with a 6.24% return vs 4.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
REET is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EFAV.
REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 3.15% for EFAV.
REET is categorized as REIT, while EFAV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while EFAV tracks MSCI EAFE Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.20% for EFAV.
REET currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REET and EFAV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer