REET vs. USRT
REET (iShares Global REIT ETF) and USRT (iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF) are both REIT funds from iShares - REET tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index while USRT tracks the FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, REET returned 3.96%/yr vs 6.03%/yr for USRT. Their correlation of 0.94 means they have usually moved in the same direction. REET charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for USRT.
Performance
REET vs. USRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, REET achieves a 15.12% return, which is significantly lower than USRT's 20.27% return. Over the past 10 years, REET has underperformed USRT with an annualized return of 3.96%, while USRT has yielded a comparatively higher 6.03% annualized return.
REET
- 1D
- -0.60%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 11.89%
- YTD
- 15.12%
- 1Y
- 20.32%
- 3Y*
- 10.22%
- 5Y*
- 2.88%
- 10Y*
- 3.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.94%
USRT
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- 6M
- 16.77%
- YTD
- 20.27%
- 1Y
- 25.30%
- 3Y*
- 12.13%
- 5Y*
- 5.19%
- 10Y*
- 6.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.55%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $83.60M | $81.13M | $68.88M | |
| $30.77M | $33.55M | $34.12M |
REET vs. USRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 15.12% | 7.97% | 2.65% | 10.28% | -24.10% | 32.43% | -10.48% | 24.42% | -5.27% | 7.48% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 20.27% | 2.44% | 8.58% | 13.64% | -24.43% | 43.26% | -8.06% | 25.98% | -4.67% | 5.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between REET and USRT is 0.95 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2014 | 0.94 |
The correlation between REET and USRT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
REET vs. USRT — Risk / Return Rank
REET
USRT
REET vs. USRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) and iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| REET | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.31 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.25 | 3.09 | -0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.27 | 10.42 | -2.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
REET vs. USRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum REET drawdown since its inception was -44.59%, smaller than the maximum USRT drawdown of -69.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for REET and USRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| REET | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.59% | -69.92% | +25.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.04% | -8.04% | -1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.02% | -18.70% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.11% | -31.03% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.59% | -44.38% | -0.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.77% | -2.76% | +0.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.66% | -12.88% | +3.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.46% | 2.37% | +0.09% |
Volatility
REET vs. USRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Global REIT ETF (REET) is 3.70%, while iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF (USRT) has a volatility of 4.64%. This indicates that REET experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| REET | USRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 4.64% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.89% | 10.64% | -0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.45% | 13.87% | -1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.96% | 18.93% | -1.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.84% | 21.34% | -2.50% |
REET vs. USRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
REET has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than USRT's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
REET vs. USRT - Dividend Comparison
REET's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, more than USRT's 2.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
REET iShares Global REIT ETF | 3.27% | 3.67% | 3.64% | 3.27% | 2.43% | 3.18% | 2.65% | 5.25% | 5.73% | 3.84% | 5.37% | 3.56% |
USRT iShares Core U.S. REIT ETF | 2.51% | 3.07% | 2.85% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.27% | 3.12% | 3.34% | 5.66% | 3.44% | 3.98% | 3.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, REET and USRT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
USRT has higher volatility (4.64%) compared to REET (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, REET dropped -44.59% vs USRT's -69.92%.
On 10-year performance, USRT leads with 6.03% vs 3.96% for REET. On fees, USRT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, REET has been the lower-risk option at 3.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USRT has performed better with a 6.03% return vs 3.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
USRT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for REET.
REET has the higher dividend yield at 3.27%, compared with 2.51% for USRT.
REET tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global REIT Index, while USRT tracks FTSE Nareit Equity REITS 40 Act Capped Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for REET and 0.08% for USRT.
USRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for REET and USRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer