PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDWU vs. TSLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDWU vs. TSLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RDWU

1D
-19.99%
1M
264.40%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLT

1D
-0.05%
1M
13.53%
YTD
-21.79%
6M
-22.60%
1Y
3.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDWU vs. TSLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDWU and TSLT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

0.44

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDWU vs. TSLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDWU

TSLT
TSLT Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
TSLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLT Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDWU vs. TSLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and T-Rex 2X Long Tesla Daily Target ETF (TSLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RDWU vs. TSLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDWUTSLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.01

+0.47

Drawdowns

RDWU vs. TSLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDWU drawdown since its inception was -66.94%, smaller than the maximum TSLT drawdown of -83.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWU and TSLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDWUTSLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.94%

-83.16%

+16.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-55.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.92%

-62.01%

+11.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.16%

-50.23%

+7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.07%

Volatility

RDWU vs. TSLT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDWUTSLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

54.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

251.67%

92.40%

+159.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

251.67%

117.05%

+134.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

251.67%

117.05%

+134.62%

RDWU vs. TSLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLT's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDWU vs. TSLT - Dividend Comparison

Neither RDWU nor TSLT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RDWU and TSLT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TSLT is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSLT is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDWU.

RDWU and TSLT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDWU and 1.05% for TSLT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDWU and TSLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer