PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDWU vs. MULL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDWU vs. MULL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RDWU

1D
31.87%
1M
376.22%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MULL

1D
-15.62%
1M
119.20%
YTD
774.91%
6M
1,229.17%
1Y
5,016.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDWU vs. MULL - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDWU and MULL is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDWU vs. MULL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDWU

MULL
MULL Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
MULL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MULL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
MULL Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
MULL Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
MULL Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDWU vs. MULL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and GraniteShares 2x Long MU Daily ETF (MULL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RDWU vs. MULL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDWUMULLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

6.53

-5.00

Drawdowns

RDWU vs. MULL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDWU drawdown since its inception was -66.94%, smaller than the maximum MULL drawdown of -72.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWU and MULL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDWUMULLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.94%

-72.29%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.27%

-15.62%

-19.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.07%

-20.61%

-22.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.82%

Volatility

RDWU vs. MULL - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDWUMULLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

57.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

107.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

255.53%

133.41%

+122.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

255.53%

136.72%

+118.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

255.53%

136.72%

+118.81%

RDWU vs. MULL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both RDWU and MULL have an expense ratio of 1.50%.


Dividends

RDWU vs. MULL - Dividend Comparison

RDWU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MULL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RDWU and MULL have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 1.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

RDWU and MULL have the same expense ratio: 1.50% per year.

MULL has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for RDWU.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and GraniteShares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDWU and MULL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer