PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDWU vs. GLWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDWU vs. GLWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RDWU

1D
-19.99%
1M
264.40%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GLWG

1D
0.42%
1M
46.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDWU vs. GLWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDWU and GLWG is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 2026

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDWU vs. GLWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long GLW Daily ETF (GLWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RDWU vs. GLWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDWUGLWGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

8.78

-8.31

Drawdowns

RDWU vs. GLWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDWU drawdown since its inception was -66.94%, which is greater than GLWG's maximum drawdown of -29.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWU and GLWG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDWUGLWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.94%

-29.53%

-37.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.92%

-10.32%

-40.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.16%

-10.71%

-32.45%

Volatility

RDWU vs. GLWG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDWUGLWGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

251.67%

151.06%

+100.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

251.67%

151.06%

+100.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

251.67%

151.06%

+100.61%

RDWU vs. GLWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GLWG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDWU vs. GLWG - Dividend Comparison

Neither RDWU nor GLWG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


RDWU and GLWG have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GLWG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GLWG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDWU.

RDWU and GLWG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

RDWU tracks Redwire Corporation (RDW), while GLWG tracks Corning Incorporated (GLW). They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDWU and 0.75% for GLWG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDWU and GLWG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer