PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDWU vs. ARMG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDWU vs. ARMG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RDWU

1D
31.87%
1M
376.22%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMG

1D
-9.19%
1M
211.14%
YTD
841.05%
6M
460.44%
1Y
443.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDWU vs. ARMG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDWU and ARMG is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDWU vs. ARMG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDWU

ARMG
ARMG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ARMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ARMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDWU vs. ARMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ARM Daily ETF (ARMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RDWU vs. ARMG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDWUARMGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

1.10

+0.42

Drawdowns

RDWU vs. ARMG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDWU drawdown since its inception was -66.94%, smaller than the maximum ARMG drawdown of -80.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWU and ARMG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDWUARMGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.94%

-80.28%

+13.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-68.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.27%

-9.19%

-26.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.07%

-52.91%

+9.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

38.55%

Volatility

RDWU vs. ARMG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDWUARMGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

66.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

104.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

255.53%

130.67%

+124.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

255.53%

138.36%

+117.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

255.53%

138.36%

+117.17%

RDWU vs. ARMG - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDWU vs. ARMG - Dividend Comparison

RDWU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RDWU and ARMG have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDWU.

ARMG has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.00% for RDWU.

They also come from different issuers: T-Rex and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDWU and 0.75% for ARMG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDWU and ARMG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer