PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDWU vs. MSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDWU vs. MSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


RDWU

1D
31.87%
1M
376.22%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

MSFX

1D
0.51%
1M
7.01%
YTD
-27.97%
6M
-29.61%
1Y
-29.06%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDWU vs. MSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDWU and MSFX is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2026

0.27

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDWU vs. MSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDWU

MSFX
MSFX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
MSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
MSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDWU vs. MSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T-REX 2X Long RDW Daily Target ETF (RDWU) and T-Rex 2X Long Microsoft Daily Target ETF (MSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

RDWU vs. MSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDWUMSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.53

-0.16

+1.69

Drawdowns

RDWU vs. MSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDWU drawdown since its inception was -66.94%, which is greater than MSFX's maximum drawdown of -60.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDWU and MSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDWUMSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.94%

-60.86%

-6.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-60.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.27%

-45.47%

+10.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-43.07%

-21.28%

-21.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

31.93%

Volatility

RDWU vs. MSFX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDWUMSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

255.53%

50.39%

+205.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

255.53%

49.29%

+206.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

255.53%

49.29%

+206.24%

RDWU vs. MSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDWU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDWU vs. MSFX - Dividend Comparison

RDWU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.42%.


Frequently Asked Questions


RDWU and MSFX have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, MSFX is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

MSFX is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for RDWU.

MSFX has the higher dividend yield at 7.42%, compared with 0.00% for RDWU.

Their fees differ too: 1.50% for RDWU and 1.05% for MSFX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDWU and MSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer