RDVT vs. REG
RDVT (Red Violet, Inc.) and REG (Regency Centers Corporation) are both stocks. RDVT operates in Software - Application (Technology), while REG operates in REIT - Retail (Real Estate). Over the past 5 years, RDVT returned 23.71%/yr vs 8.45%/yr for REG. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
RDVT vs. REG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDVT achieves a 21.83% return, which is significantly higher than REG's 18.56% return.
RDVT
- 1D
- 1.49%
- 1M
- 5.89%
- 6M
- 52.55%
- YTD
- 21.83%
- 1Y
- 63.71%
- 3Y*
- 49.95%
- 5Y*
- 23.71%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.13%
REG
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.83%
- 6M
- 12.31%
- YTD
- 18.56%
- 1Y
- 18.58%
- 3Y*
- 11.28%
- 5Y*
- 8.45%
- 10Y*
- 3.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.05%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
RDVT Red Violet, Inc. | $12.91M | $11.87M | $10.68M |
| $115.94M | $105.24M | $116.44M |
RDVT vs. REG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVT Red Violet, Inc. | 21.83% | 58.63% | 81.27% | -13.25% | -42.00% | 52.01% | 41.06% | 174.63% | -76.76% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 18.56% | -2.78% | 14.90% | 11.85% | -13.59% | 71.41% | -23.86% | 11.43% | 7.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDVT and REG is 0.07, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018 | 0.19 |
The correlation between RDVT and REG shifts across timeframes, from 0.07 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
RDVT:
$978.88M
REG:
$14.66B
RDVT:
$0.97
REG:
$3.60
RDVT:
71.19
REG:
22.32
RDVT:
0.14
REG:
2.18
RDVT:
10.67
REG:
8.54
RDVT:
9.55
REG:
2.21
RDVT:
$94.08M
REG:
$1.72B
RDVT:
$79.25M
REG:
$605.17M
RDVT:
$23.76M
REG:
$1.19B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDVT vs. REG — Risk / Return Rank
RDVT
REG
RDVT vs. REG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and Regency Centers Corporation (REG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDVT | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.19 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.35 | 2.10 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.06 | 5.18 | -2.11 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDVT vs. REG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDVT drawdown since its inception was -90.17%, which is greater than REG's maximum drawdown of -73.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVT and REG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDVT | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.17% | -73.37% | -16.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.11% | -8.17% | -33.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.11% | -15.10% | -27.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.73% | -30.09% | -33.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -55.76% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.89% | +2.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -49.64% | -16.11% | -33.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.50% | 3.30% | +15.20% |
Volatility
RDVT vs. REG - Volatility Comparison
Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) has a higher volatility of 12.97% compared to Regency Centers Corporation (REG) at 5.17%. This indicates that RDVT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than REG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDVT | REG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.97% | 5.17% | +7.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 37.65% | 11.67% | +25.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.87% | 16.14% | +30.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.45% | 22.18% | +27.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.02% | 29.89% | +41.13% |
Dividends
RDVT vs. REG - Dividend Comparison
RDVT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while REG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.70%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDVT Red Violet, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.53% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
REG Regency Centers Corporation | 3.70% | 4.16% | 3.67% | 3.91% | 4.04% | 3.20% | 5.22% | 3.71% | 3.78% | 3.04% | 2.90% | 2.85% |
Financials
RDVT vs. REG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Red Violet, Inc. and Regency Centers Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
RDVT vs. REG - Profitability Comparison
RDVT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported a gross profit of 22.01M and revenue of 25.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.2%.
REG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a gross profit of 76.76M and revenue of 414.76M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.5%.
RDVT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported an operating income of 5.44M and revenue of 25.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 21.1%.
REG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported an operating income of 152.26M and revenue of 414.76M, resulting in an operating margin of 36.7%.
RDVT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Red Violet, Inc. reported a net income of 4.39M and revenue of 25.83M, resulting in a net margin of 17.0%.
REG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Regency Centers Corporation reported a net income of 115.76M and revenue of 414.76M, resulting in a net margin of 27.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
RDVT and REG have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDVT has higher volatility (12.97%) compared to REG (5.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVT dropped -90.17% vs REG's -73.37%.
RDVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDVT and REG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer