RDVT vs. KULR

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RDVT (Red Violet, Inc.) and KULR (KULR Technology Group, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — RDVT in Software - Application, KULR in Electronic Components. Over the past 5 years, RDVT returned 22.00%/yr vs -27.50%/yr for KULR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

RDVT vs. KULR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDVT achieves a -4.55% return, which is significantly lower than KULR's 34.80% return.

RDVT

• 1D: -1.34%
• 1M: 7.35%
• YTD: -4.55%
• 6M: -3.02%
• 1Y: 14.56%
• 3Y*: 40.46%
• 5Y*: 22.00%
• 10Y*: —

KULR

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -13.45%
• YTD: 34.80%
• 6M: 6.40%
• 1Y: -42.36%
• 3Y*: -8.33%
• 5Y*: -27.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDVT vs. KULR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RDVT Red Violet, Inc.	-4.55%	58.63%	81.27%	-13.25%	-42.00%	52.01%	41.06%	174.63%	-10.37%
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	34.80%	-89.58%	1,818.92%	-84.58%	-56.52%	87.76%	-2.00%	-42.31%	136.36%

Correlation

The correlation between RDVT and KULR is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2018	0.12

Fundamentals

Market Cap RDVT : $782.47M KULR : $158.51M
EPS RDVT : $0.97 KULR : -$1.57
PS Ratio RDVT : 8.37 KULR : 9.74
PB Ratio RDVT : 7.49 KULR : 1.30
Total Revenue (TTM) RDVT : $94.08M KULR : $16.17M
Gross Profit (TTM) RDVT : $79.25M KULR : $770.97K
EBITDA (TTM) RDVT : $23.76M KULR : -$60.59M

Return for Risk

RDVT vs. KULR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDVT

RDVT Risk / Return Rank: 51
RDVT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RDVT Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
RDVT Omega Ratio Rank: 49
RDVT Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
RDVT Martin Ratio Rank: 51

KULR

KULR Risk / Return Rank: 26
KULR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
KULR Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
KULR Omega Ratio Rank: 30
KULR Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
KULR Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDVT vs. KULR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) and KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDVT	KULR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.32	-0.41	+0.73
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.76	-0.05	+0.81
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	0.99	+0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.35	-0.59	+0.94
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.77	-0.88	+1.65

RDVT vs. KULR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDVT Sharpe Ratio is 0.32, which is higher than the KULR Sharpe Ratio of -0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDVT and KULR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDVT vs. KULR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDVT drawdown since its inception was -90.17%, smaller than the maximum KULR drawdown of -97.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDVT and KULR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDVT	KULR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.17%	-97.23%	+7.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.11%	-71.67%	+29.56%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.11%	-94.74%	+52.63%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.73%	-96.86%	+33.13%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.52%	-89.61%	+81.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.26%	-66.31%	+16.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	18.98%	48.00%	-29.02%

Volatility

RDVT vs. KULR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Red Violet, Inc. (RDVT) is 13.13%, while KULR Technology Group, Inc. (KULR) has a volatility of 39.74%. This indicates that RDVT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KULR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDVT	KULR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.13%	39.74%	-26.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.50%	77.08%	-39.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	45.68%	102.99%	-57.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.34%	126.17%	-76.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	71.29%	127.04%	-55.75%

Dividends

RDVT vs. KULR - Dividend Comparison

Neither RDVT nor KULR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
KULR KULR Technology Group, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%
RDVT Red Violet, Inc.	0.00%	0.53%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDVT and KULR in my portfolio?

RDVT and KULR have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDVT or KULR?

KULR has higher volatility (39.74%) compared to RDVT (13.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDVT dropped -90.17% vs KULR's -97.23%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDVT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.32 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.