RDTE vs. DRAM

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

RDTE (Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDTE is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Roundhill, while DRAM is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.

Performance

RDTE vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

RDTE

• 1D: 1.03%
• 1M: 6.25%
• YTD: 18.03%
• 6M: 15.21%
• 1Y: 32.40%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRAM

• 1D: 5.23%
• 1M: 52.82%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTE vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	16.88%
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	198.96%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and DRAM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026	0.55

Return for Risk

RDTE vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTE

RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 61
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 52
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 69

DRAM

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTE vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDTE	DRAM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.89	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.56	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.29	—	—

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -19.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and DRAM.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTE	DRAM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.32%	-19.97%	-4.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.56%	-2.89%	-1.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RDTE	DRAM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.03%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.05%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.26%	87.28%	-70.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.31%	87.28%	-67.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.31%	87.28%	-67.97%

RDTE vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDTE vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.75%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	43.75%	50.16%	10.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTE and DRAM in my portfolio?

RDTE and DRAM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RDTE or DRAM?

On fees, DRAM is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTE or DRAM?

DRAM is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RDTE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTE or DRAM?

RDTE has the higher dividend yield at 43.75%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

What is the main difference between RDTE and DRAM?

RDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while DRAM is Technology Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RDTE and 0.65% for DRAM.