PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDTE vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDTE vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 19.71% return, which is significantly higher than BUCK's 2.60% return.


RDTE

1D
1.29%
1M
1.03%
6M
14.10%
YTD
19.71%
1Y
31.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.31%

BUCK

1D
0.17%
1M
0.34%
6M
1.97%
YTD
2.60%
1Y
5.54%
3Y*
5.24%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$3.71M$3.67M$3.97M
$2.49M$2.79M$2.91M

RDTE vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and BUCK is 0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDTE vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RDTE
RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RDTE vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDTEBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.47

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

6.65

-3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.11

31.30

-19.19

RDTE vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDTE Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDTE and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDTEBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.32%

-5.43%

-18.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.17%

-0.84%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.33%

-0.47%

-3.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

0.18%

+2.43%

Volatility

RDTE vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) has a higher volatility of 3.83% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.42%. This indicates that RDTE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDTEBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.83%

0.42%

+3.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

1.25%

+11.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.97%

2.47%

+14.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.94%

3.42%

+15.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.94%

3.42%

+15.52%

RDTE vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDTE vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 43.76%, more than BUCK's 7.19% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.19%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
RDTE
Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF
43.76%50.16%10.70%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDTE and BUCK have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDTE has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to BUCK (0.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDTE dropped -24.32% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, RDTE leads with 31.52% vs 5.54% for BUCK. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, RDTE has performed better with a 31.52% return vs 5.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.97% for RDTE.

RDTE has the higher dividend yield at 43.76%, compared with 7.19% for BUCK.

RDTE is categorized as Derivative Income, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RDTE and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDTE and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer