RDTE vs. AMDW

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

RDTE (Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF) and AMDW (Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RDTE charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for AMDW.

Performance

RDTE vs. AMDW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDTE achieves a 17.79% return, which is significantly lower than AMDW's 184.48% return.

RDTE

• 1D: -0.55%
• 1M: 2.84%
• 6M: 13.42%
• YTD: 17.79%
• 1Y: 26.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AMDW

• 1D: -5.28%
• 1M: 4.62%
• 6M: 195.75%
• YTD: 184.48%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDTE vs. AMDW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	17.79%	5.45%
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	184.48%	36.56%

Correlation

The correlation between RDTE and AMDW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.54

Return for Risk

RDTE vs. AMDW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDTE

RDTE Risk / Return Rank: 63
RDTE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
RDTE Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
RDTE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
RDTE Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
RDTE Martin Ratio Rank: 70

AMDW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDTE vs. AMDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF (RDTE) and Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF (AMDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDTE	AMDW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.19	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.18	—	—

Drawdowns

RDTE vs. AMDW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDTE drawdown since its inception was -24.32%, smaller than the maximum AMDW drawdown of -34.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDTE and AMDW.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDTE	AMDW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.32%	-34.64%	+10.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.17%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.29%	-9.37%	+8.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.44%	-13.88%	+9.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.64%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	RDTE	AMDW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.30%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.03%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.14%	83.65%	-66.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.10%	83.65%	-64.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.10%	83.65%	-64.55%

RDTE vs. AMDW - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDTE has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than AMDW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDTE vs. AMDW - Dividend Comparison

RDTE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.43%, more than AMDW's 42.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
AMDW Roundhill AMD WeeklyPay ETF	42.20%	34.78%	0.00%
RDTE Roundhill Russell 2000 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF	44.43%	50.16%	10.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDTE and AMDW in my portfolio?

RDTE and AMDW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, RDTE or AMDW?

On fees, RDTE is cheaper at 0.97% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDTE or AMDW?

RDTE is cheaper with a 0.97% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for AMDW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDTE or AMDW?

RDTE has the higher dividend yield at 44.43%, compared with 42.20% for AMDW.

What is the main difference between RDTE and AMDW?

Their fees differ too: 0.97% for RDTE and 0.99% for AMDW.