PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDIV vs. XLB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDIV vs. XLB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 16.75% return, which is significantly higher than XLB's 15.57% return. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has outperformed XLB with an annualized return of 11.39%, while XLB has yielded a comparatively lower 10.54% annualized return.


RDIV

1D
1.52%
1M
6.52%
YTD
16.75%
6M
14.41%
1Y
32.09%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
11.12%
10Y*
11.39%

XLB

1D
1.87%
1M
0.99%
YTD
15.57%
6M
16.68%
1Y
21.77%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*
10.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDIV vs. XLB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
16.75%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%11.63%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
15.57%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and XLB is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013

0.72

The correlation between RDIV and XLB shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.74 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RDIV vs. XLB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDIV
XLB

Financial Services

17.8%

-

Energy

17.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

15.0%
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

14.6%

-

Communication Services

8.8%

-

Real Estate

7.3%

-

Healthcare

6.8%

-

Technology

6.2%

-

Utilities

6.2%

-

Basic Materials

0.5%
87.3%

Industrials

-

1.5%

Financial Services

RDIV
17.8%
XLB

-

Energy

RDIV
17.3%
XLB

-

Consumer Cyclical

RDIV
15.0%
XLB
12.7%

Consumer Defensive

RDIV
14.6%
XLB

-

Communication Services

RDIV
8.8%
XLB

-

Real Estate

RDIV
7.3%
XLB

-

Healthcare

RDIV
6.8%
XLB

-

Technology

RDIV
6.2%
XLB

-

Utilities

RDIV
6.2%
XLB

-

Basic Materials

RDIV
0.5%
XLB
87.3%

Industrials

RDIV

-

XLB
1.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDIV vs. XLB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDIV vs. XLB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDIVXLBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.20

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.30

1.65

+4.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.74

5.05

+13.69

RDIV vs. XLB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is higher than the XLB Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and XLB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. XLB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, smaller than the maximum XLB drawdown of -59.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and XLB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDIVXLBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-59.83%

+9.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

-12.38%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-23.17%

+5.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

-24.72%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

-37.27%

-12.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.25%

+2.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.85%

-10.83%

+4.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.64%

4.04%

-2.40%

Volatility

RDIV vs. XLB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) is 3.52%, while Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) has a volatility of 7.05%. This indicates that RDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDIVXLBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

7.05%

-3.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.64%

13.58%

-4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.19%

17.49%

-4.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.55%

19.06%

-1.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.88%

20.70%

+1.18%

RDIV vs. XLB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than XLB's 0.13% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDIV vs. XLB - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than XLB's 1.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.51%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.68%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDIV and XLB have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLB has higher volatility (7.05%) compared to RDIV (3.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs XLB's -59.83%.

On 10-year performance, RDIV leads with 11.39% vs 10.54% for XLB. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, RDIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 11.39% return vs 10.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 1.68% for XLB.

RDIV is categorized as Mid Cap Value Equities, while XLB is Materials. RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.13% for XLB.

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDIV and XLB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer