XLB vs. FMAT
Compare and contrast key facts about Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT).
XLB and FMAT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLB is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Materials Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. FMAT is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. Both XLB and FMAT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: XLB or FMAT.
Correlation
The correlation between XLB and FMAT is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
XLB vs. FMAT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
XLB:
0.40
FMAT:
0.46
XLB:
0.64
FMAT:
0.73
XLB:
1.08
FMAT:
1.09
XLB:
0.54
FMAT:
0.76
XLB:
1.62
FMAT:
1.99
XLB:
3.29%
FMAT:
3.28%
XLB:
13.29%
FMAT:
14.13%
XLB:
-59.83%
FMAT:
-41.11%
XLB:
-9.91%
FMAT:
-8.56%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLB achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than FMAT's 4.73% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLB having a 8.19% annualized return and FMAT not far ahead at 8.22%.
XLB
4.14%
-3.65%
-0.87%
5.16%
9.87%
8.19%
FMAT
4.73%
-3.61%
1.33%
6.13%
10.23%
8.22%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLB vs. FMAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLB has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than FMAT's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
XLB vs. FMAT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
XLB vs. FMAT - Dividend Comparison
XLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, more than FMAT's 1.20% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.33% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.08% |
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF | 1.20% | 1.71% | 2.00% | 1.44% | 1.73% | 1.89% | 2.18% | 1.53% | 1.78% | 2.16% | 1.65% | 0.39% |
Drawdowns
XLB vs. FMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLB drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, which is greater than FMAT's maximum drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB and FMAT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
XLB vs. FMAT - Volatility Comparison
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT) have volatilities of 3.37% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.