XLB vs. SPY
XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLB is a Materials fund tracking the Materials Select Sector Index, while SPY is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLB returned 10.60%/yr vs 15.70%/yr for SPY. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLB charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for SPY.
Performance
XLB vs. SPY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLB achieves a 14.76% return, which is significantly higher than SPY's 9.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XLB has underperformed SPY with an annualized return of 10.60%, while SPY has yielded a comparatively higher 15.70% annualized return.
XLB
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- YTD
- 14.76%
- 6M
- 13.96%
- 1Y
- 22.26%
- 3Y*
- 11.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.85%
- 10Y*
- 10.60%
SPY
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- 9.74%
- 6M
- 9.27%
- 1Y
- 26.65%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 13.51%
- 10Y*
- 15.70%
XLB vs. SPY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 14.76% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 24.13% | -14.88% | 24.01% |
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 9.74% | 17.72% | 24.89% | 26.18% | -18.18% | 28.73% | 18.33% | 31.22% | -4.57% | 21.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLB and SPY is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.72 |
The correlation between XLB and SPY shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.74 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLB vs. SPY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLB
SPY
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
XLB
SPY
Consumer Cyclical
XLB
SPY
Industrials
XLB
SPY
Communication Services
XLB
-
SPY
Consumer Defensive
XLB
-
SPY
Energy
XLB
-
SPY
Financial Services
XLB
-
SPY
Healthcare
XLB
-
SPY
Real Estate
XLB
-
SPY
Technology
XLB
-
SPY
Utilities
XLB
-
SPY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLB vs. SPY — Risk / Return Rank
XLB
SPY
XLB vs. SPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLB | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.39 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 3.01 | -1.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.51 | 13.54 | -8.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLB vs. SPY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLB drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, which is greater than SPY's maximum drawdown of -55.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB and SPY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLB | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.83% | -55.19% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -8.88% | -3.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.17% | -18.76% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.72% | -24.50% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.27% | -33.72% | -3.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -1.75% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -9.04% | -1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.05% | 1.97% | +2.08% |
Volatility
XLB vs. SPY - Volatility Comparison
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) has a higher volatility of 5.94% compared to State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF (SPY) at 4.64%. This indicates that XLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLB | SPY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.94% | 4.64% | +1.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.55% | 9.75% | +3.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.48% | 12.43% | +5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.01% | 17.14% | +1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 17.99% | +2.72% |
XLB vs. SPY - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLB has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SPY's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLB vs. SPY - Dividend Comparison
XLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than SPY's 1.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPY State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF | 1.01% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 1.20% | 1.52% | 1.75% | 2.04% | 1.80% | 2.03% | 2.06% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.07% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLB and SPY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLB has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to SPY (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLB dropped -59.83% vs SPY's -55.19%.
On 10-year performance, SPY leads with 15.70% vs 10.60% for XLB. On fees, SPY is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, SPY has been the lower-risk option at 4.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPY has performed better with a 15.70% return vs 10.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPY is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLB.
XLB has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 1.01% for SPY.
XLB is categorized as Materials, while SPY is S&P 500. XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index, while SPY tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLB and 0.09% for SPY.
SPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLB and SPY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer