XLB vs. XLY
XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XLY (Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XLB is a Materials fund tracking the Materials Select Sector Index, while XLY is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLB returned 10.51%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for XLY. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.13% expense ratio.
Performance
XLB vs. XLY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLB achieves a 16.77% return, which is significantly higher than XLY's -0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, XLB has underperformed XLY with an annualized return of 10.51%, while XLY has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.
XLB
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 16.77%
- 6M
- 18.28%
- 1Y
- 22.00%
- 3Y*
- 11.01%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 10.51%
XLY
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- YTD
- -0.60%
- 6M
- -2.46%
- 1Y
- 11.57%
- 3Y*
- 13.43%
- 5Y*
- 7.35%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
XLB vs. XLY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 16.77% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 24.13% | -14.88% | 24.01% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | -0.60% | 7.37% | 26.51% | 39.64% | -36.27% | 27.93% | 29.63% | 28.39% | 1.58% | 22.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLB and XLY is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.64 |
The correlation between XLB and XLY shifts across timeframes, from 0.53 (1 year) to 0.64 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLB vs. XLY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLB
XLY
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
XLB
XLY
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLB
XLY
Industrials
XLB
XLY
Communication Services
XLB
-
XLY
Consumer Defensive
XLB
-
XLY
-
Energy
XLB
-
XLY
-
Financial Services
XLB
-
XLY
-
Healthcare
XLB
-
XLY
-
Real Estate
XLB
-
XLY
-
Technology
XLB
-
XLY
Utilities
XLB
-
XLY
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLB vs. XLY — Risk / Return Rank
XLB
XLY
XLB vs. XLY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLB | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.85 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.12 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.78 | 0.78 | +1.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.46 | 2.37 | +3.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLB vs. XLY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLB drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, roughly equal to the maximum XLY drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB and XLY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLB | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.83% | -59.05% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -14.98% | +2.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.17% | -26.01% | +2.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.72% | -39.67% | +14.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.27% | -39.67% | +2.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.24% | -4.68% | +3.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.83% | -9.55% | -1.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 4.89% | -0.85% |
Volatility
XLB vs. XLY - Volatility Comparison
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLY) have volatilities of 6.40% and 6.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLB | XLY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.40% | 6.15% | +0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.47% | 13.54% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.45% | 18.32% | -0.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.05% | 23.85% | -4.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 22.09% | -1.38% |
XLB vs. XLY - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both XLB and XLY have an expense ratio of 0.13%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLB vs. XLY - Dividend Comparison
XLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, more than XLY's 0.75% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.66% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
XLY Consumer Discretionary Select Sector SPDR Fund | 0.75% | 0.79% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 1.00% | 0.53% | 0.82% | 1.28% | 1.34% | 1.20% | 1.71% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLB and XLY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLB has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to XLY (6.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLB dropped -59.83% vs XLY's -59.05%.
On 10-year performance, XLY leads with 12.91% vs 10.51% for XLB. Both ETFs have the same 0.13% expense ratio. On volatility, XLY has been the lower-risk option at 6.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLY has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 10.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLB and XLY have the same expense ratio: 0.13% per year.
XLB has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.75% for XLY.
XLB is categorized as Materials, while XLY is Consumer Discretionary Equities. XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index, while XLY tracks Consumer Discretionary Select Sector Index.
XLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLB and XLY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer