RDIV vs. TMDV
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV).
RDIV and TMDV are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RDIV is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index. It was launched on Oct 1, 2013. TMDV is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Dividend Elite Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 2019. Both RDIV and TMDV are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RDIV vs. TMDV - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RDIV vs. TMDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 8.05% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 1.83% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 3.86% | 2.91% | 2.64% | 2.25% | -5.10% | 23.45% | 4.82% | 3.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 8.05% return, which is significantly higher than TMDV's 3.86% return.
RDIV
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 8.05%
- 6M
- 8.98%
- 1Y
- 18.77%
- 3Y*
- 15.30%
- 5Y*
- 11.03%
- 10Y*
- 10.84%
TMDV
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- -6.29%
- YTD
- 3.86%
- 6M
- 3.24%
- 1Y
- 4.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.12%
- 5Y*
- 3.69%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RDIV vs. TMDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than TMDV's 0.35% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. TMDV — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
TMDV
RDIV vs. TMDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDIV | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.03 | 0.33 | +0.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.52 | 0.59 | +0.93 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.07 | +0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 0.56 | +0.93 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.12 | 1.62 | +4.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDIV | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.03 | 0.33 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 | 0.26 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.30 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and TMDV is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
RDIV vs. TMDV - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.79%, more than TMDV's 2.64% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.79% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
TMDV ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF | 2.64% | 2.65% | 2.70% | 2.45% | 2.46% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. TMDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than TMDV's maximum drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and TMDV.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -33.42% | -16.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.53% | -10.52% | -3.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -17.11% | -7.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.68% | -7.16% | +5.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.92% | -5.42% | -0.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.30% | 3.62% | -0.32% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. TMDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) is 3.20%, while ProShares Russell U.S. Dividend Growers ETF (TMDV) has a volatility of 3.78%. This indicates that RDIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TMDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | TMDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.20% | 3.78% | -0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.72% | 8.37% | +1.35% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.29% | 14.88% | +3.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.69% | 14.43% | +3.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.91% | 18.79% | +3.12% |