PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDIV vs. IVOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RDIV vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 22.74% return, which is significantly higher than IVOV's 13.17% return. Over the past 10 years, RDIV has outperformed IVOV with an annualized return of 11.30%, while IVOV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.61% annualized return.


RDIV

1D
-0.32%
1M
6.60%
6M
17.44%
YTD
22.74%
1Y
36.48%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
13.86%
10Y*
11.30%
ALL TIME*
11.74%

IVOV

1D
-0.27%
1M
0.84%
6M
8.73%
YTD
13.17%
1Y
22.84%
3Y*
11.95%
5Y*
9.15%
10Y*
10.61%
ALL TIME*
11.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$975.54K$1.11M$1.64M
$3.34M$2.84M$4.35M

RDIV vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
22.74%12.36%15.17%4.66%7.16%29.12%-9.31%22.62%-4.78%11.63%
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
13.17%7.61%11.53%15.38%-7.20%30.50%3.70%25.91%-12.13%12.22%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and IVOV is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.84

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013

0.82

The correlation between RDIV and IVOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

RDIV vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RDIV
IVOV

Financial Services

19.2%
21.8%

Energy

17.0%
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

15.4%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

14.5%
13.9%

Communication Services

8.0%
0.8%

Real Estate

7.6%
9.5%

Healthcare

6.8%
3.8%

Utilities

6.4%
4.0%

Technology

5.1%
10.3%

Basic Materials

0.5%
5.7%

Industrials

-

19.2%

Financial Services

RDIV
19.2%
IVOV
21.8%

Energy

RDIV
17.0%
IVOV
6.3%

Consumer Defensive

RDIV
15.4%
IVOV
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

RDIV
14.5%
IVOV
13.9%

Communication Services

RDIV
8.0%
IVOV
0.8%

Real Estate

RDIV
7.6%
IVOV
9.5%

Healthcare

RDIV
6.8%
IVOV
3.8%

Utilities

RDIV
6.4%
IVOV
4.0%

Technology

RDIV
5.1%
IVOV
10.3%

Basic Materials

RDIV
0.5%
IVOV
5.7%

Industrials

RDIV

-

IVOV
19.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RDIV vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RDIV
RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

IVOV
IVOV Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IVOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVOV Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
IVOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVOV Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RDIV vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RDIVIVOVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.25

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.24

1.98

+5.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.00

7.05

+14.95

RDIV vs. IVOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is higher than the IVOV Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and IVOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and IVOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RDIVIVOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.97%

-45.99%

-3.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.84%

-10.58%

+5.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.91%

-22.61%

+4.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.89%

-22.61%

-2.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.97%

-45.99%

-3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.46%

-1.21%

-0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-5.38%

-0.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.59%

2.97%

-1.38%

Volatility

RDIV vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) at 3.31%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RDIVIVOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.00%

3.31%

+0.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.25%

10.36%

-1.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.49%

14.98%

-1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

19.26%

-1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.85%

21.65%

+0.20%

RDIV vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

RDIV vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than IVOV's 1.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IVOV
Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF
1.61%1.82%1.74%1.52%1.97%1.78%2.42%1.75%1.87%1.55%1.51%1.66%
RDIV
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF
3.45%3.94%4.08%3.93%3.44%3.31%4.93%3.84%4.32%4.26%2.20%4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


RDIV and IVOV have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDIV has higher volatility (4.00%) compared to IVOV (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs IVOV's -45.99%.

On 10-year performance, RDIV leads with 11.30% vs 10.61% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 11.30% return vs 10.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.45%, compared with 1.61% for IVOV.

RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.10% for IVOV.

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.61 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RDIV and IVOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer