RDIV vs. IVOV
RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and IVOV (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index while IVOV tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, RDIV returned 11.03%/yr vs 10.85%/yr for IVOV. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOV.
Performance
RDIV vs. IVOV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than IVOV's 10.60% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with RDIV having a 11.03% annualized return and IVOV not far behind at 10.85%.
RDIV
- 1D
- 1.18%
- 1M
- 0.13%
- YTD
- 13.79%
- 6M
- 13.59%
- 1Y
- 28.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.82%
- 5Y*
- 11.36%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
IVOV
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- 2.93%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 8.95%
- 1Y
- 20.62%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 8.43%
- 10Y*
- 10.85%
RDIV vs. IVOV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 13.79% | 12.36% | 15.17% | 4.66% | 7.16% | 29.12% | -9.31% | 22.62% | -4.78% | 11.63% |
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 10.60% | 7.61% | 11.53% | 15.38% | -7.20% | 30.50% | 3.70% | 25.91% | -12.13% | 12.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between RDIV and IVOV is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2013 | 0.82 |
The correlation between RDIV and IVOV shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.85 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
RDIV vs. IVOV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
RDIV
IVOV
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Healthcare
Technology
Utilities
Basic Materials
Industrials
-
Financial Services
RDIV
IVOV
Energy
RDIV
IVOV
Consumer Cyclical
RDIV
IVOV
Consumer Defensive
RDIV
IVOV
Communication Services
RDIV
IVOV
Real Estate
RDIV
IVOV
Healthcare
RDIV
IVOV
Technology
RDIV
IVOV
Utilities
RDIV
IVOV
Basic Materials
RDIV
IVOV
Industrials
RDIV
-
IVOV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RDIV vs. IVOV — Risk / Return Rank
RDIV
IVOV
RDIV vs. IVOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| RDIV | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.24 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.95 | 1.96 | +3.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.00 | 6.74 | +10.26 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
RDIV vs. IVOV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than IVOV's maximum drawdown of -45.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and IVOV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDIV | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.97% | -45.99% | -3.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.84% | -10.58% | +5.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.91% | -22.61% | +4.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.89% | -22.61% | -2.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -49.97% | -45.99% | -3.98% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.54% | -1.21% | -1.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | -5.41% | -0.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.69% | 3.07% | -1.38% |
Volatility
RDIV vs. IVOV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF (IVOV) at 3.76%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RDIV | IVOV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.58% | 3.76% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.01% | 10.73% | -1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.41% | 15.33% | -1.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 19.43% | -1.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.89% | 21.70% | +0.19% |
RDIV vs. IVOV - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOV's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
RDIV vs. IVOV - Dividend Comparison
RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than IVOV's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IVOV Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Value ETF | 1.65% | 1.82% | 1.74% | 1.52% | 1.97% | 1.78% | 2.42% | 1.75% | 1.87% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.66% |
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF | 3.72% | 3.94% | 4.08% | 3.93% | 3.44% | 3.31% | 4.93% | 3.84% | 4.32% | 4.26% | 2.20% | 4.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RDIV and IVOV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RDIV has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to IVOV (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs IVOV's -45.99%.
On 10-year performance, RDIV leads with 11.03% vs 10.85% for IVOV. On fees, IVOV is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOV has been the lower-risk option at 3.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, RDIV has performed better with a 11.03% return vs 10.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOV is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.
RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 1.65% for IVOV.
RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while IVOV tracks S&P MidCap 400 Value Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.10% for IVOV.
RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RDIV and IVOV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer