RDIV vs. AUSF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RDIV (Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF) and AUSF (Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds - RDIV tracks the S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index while AUSF tracks the Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RDIV returned 11.36%/yr vs 13.36%/yr for AUSF. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. RDIV charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for AUSF.

Performance

RDIV vs. AUSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDIV achieves a 13.79% return, which is significantly higher than AUSF's 6.60% return.

RDIV

• 1D: 1.18%
• 1M: 0.13%
• YTD: 13.79%
• 6M: 13.59%
• 1Y: 28.68%
• 3Y*: 19.82%
• 5Y*: 11.36%
• 10Y*: 11.03%

AUSF

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: -1.45%
• YTD: 6.60%
• 6M: 5.99%
• 1Y: 14.03%
• 3Y*: 19.79%
• 5Y*: 13.36%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RDIV vs. AUSF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	13.79%	12.36%	15.17%	4.66%	7.16%	29.12%	-9.31%	22.62%	-12.94%
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	6.60%	13.69%	16.05%	22.26%	-0.18%	27.48%	1.27%	24.06%	-11.18%

Correlation

The correlation between RDIV and AUSF is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.83
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2018	0.86

The correlation between RDIV and AUSF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

RDIV vs. AUSF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RDIV	AUSF
Financial Services	17.8%	18.4%
Energy	17.3%	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	15.0%	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	14.6%	7.8%
Communication Services	8.8%	8.6%
Real Estate	7.3%	4.6%
Healthcare	6.8%	11.4%
Technology	6.2%	15.3%
Utilities	6.2%	4.4%
Basic Materials	0.5%	2.6%
Industrials	-	14.4%

Return for Risk

RDIV vs. AUSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDIV

RDIV Risk / Return Rank: 78
RDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
RDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
RDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 66
RDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

AUSF

AUSF Risk / Return Rank: 43
AUSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
AUSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
AUSF Omega Ratio Rank: 37
AUSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
AUSF Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDIV vs. AUSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) and Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDIV	AUSF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	1.38	+0.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	1.99	+1.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.24	+0.14
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.95	2.41	+3.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.00	6.87	+10.13

RDIV vs. AUSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDIV Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the AUSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDIV and AUSF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDIV vs. AUSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDIV drawdown since its inception was -49.97%, which is greater than AUSF's maximum drawdown of -44.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDIV and AUSF.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDIV	AUSF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.97%	-44.25%	-5.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.84%	-5.84%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.91%	-12.29%	-5.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.89%	-14.23%	-10.66%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.97%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.54%	-2.45%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-4.20%	-1.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.69%	2.05%	-0.36%

Volatility

RDIV vs. AUSF - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF (RDIV) has a higher volatility of 4.58% compared to Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF (AUSF) at 3.02%. This indicates that RDIV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDIV	AUSF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.58%	3.02%	+1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.01%	6.95%	+2.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.41%	10.27%	+3.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.48%	13.63%	+3.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.89%	19.03%	+2.86%

RDIV vs. AUSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDIV has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than AUSF's 0.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDIV vs. AUSF - Dividend Comparison

RDIV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.72%, more than AUSF's 2.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
AUSF Global X Adaptive U.S. Factor ETF	2.76%	2.78%	2.63%	1.83%	2.51%	2.22%	2.95%	4.02%	1.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDIV Invesco S&P Ultra Dividend Revenue ETF	3.72%	3.94%	4.08%	3.93%	3.44%	3.31%	4.93%	3.84%	4.32%	4.26%	2.20%	4.49%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDIV and AUSF in my portfolio?

RDIV and AUSF have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDIV or AUSF?

RDIV has higher volatility (4.58%) compared to AUSF (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDIV dropped -49.97% vs AUSF's -44.25%.

Which ETF is better, RDIV or AUSF?

On 5-year performance, AUSF leads with 13.36% vs 11.36% for RDIV. On fees, AUSF is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, AUSF has been the lower-risk option at 3.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDIV or AUSF?

Over the 5-year period, AUSF has performed better with a 13.36% return vs 11.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDIV or AUSF?

AUSF is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for RDIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDIV or AUSF?

RDIV has the higher dividend yield at 3.72%, compared with 2.76% for AUSF.

What is the main difference between RDIV and AUSF?

RDIV tracks S&P 900 Dividend Revenue-Weighted Index, while AUSF tracks Adaptive Wealth Strategies U.S. Factor Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for RDIV and 0.27% for AUSF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.