RDFI vs. BEGS

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

RDFI (Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF) and BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RDFI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Rareview, while BEGS is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Rareview. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, RDFI returned 6.26% vs -37.63% for BEGS. Their 0.40 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. RDFI charges 3.69%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BEGS.

Performance

RDFI vs. BEGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDFI achieves a 2.38% return, which is significantly higher than BEGS's -41.25% return.

RDFI

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -1.32%
• 6M: -0.24%
• YTD: 2.38%
• 1Y: 6.26%
• 3Y*: 9.62%
• 5Y*: 2.78%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.02%

BEGS

• 1D: -4.44%
• 1M: 0.88%
• 6M: -44.88%
• YTD: -41.25%
• 1Y: -37.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -15.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	$33.85K	$70.66K	$58.45K
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	$296.48K	$345.49K	$313.16K

RDFI vs. BEGS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	2.38%	6.90%
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	-41.25%	32.00%

Correlation

The correlation between RDFI and BEGS is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025	0.40

Return for Risk

RDFI vs. BEGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RDFI

RDFI Risk / Return Rank: 35
RDFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
RDFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 37
RDFI Omega Ratio Rank: 40
RDFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
RDFI Martin Ratio Rank: 33

BEGS

BEGS Risk / Return Rank: 4
BEGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BEGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BEGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BEGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BEGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RDFI vs. BEGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RDFI	BEGS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.96	-0.58	+1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.37	-0.52	+1.88
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	0.94	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.88	-0.65	+1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.11	-1.21	+4.32

RDFI vs. BEGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is higher than the BEGS Sharpe Ratio of -0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDFI and BEGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RDFI vs. BEGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDFI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, smaller than the maximum BEGS drawdown of -60.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDFI and BEGS.

Drawdown Indicators

	RDFI	BEGS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.71%	-60.23%	+36.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.01%	-60.23%	+52.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.71%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.44%	-56.47%	+54.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-20.76%	+13.70%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.26%	32.21%	-29.95%

Volatility

RDFI vs. BEGS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) is 2.37%, while Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) has a volatility of 16.14%. This indicates that RDFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BEGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RDFI	BEGS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.37%	16.14%	-13.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.53%	56.59%	-50.06%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.37%	67.71%	-60.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.19%	63.24%	-55.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.93%	63.24%	-55.31%

RDFI vs. BEGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDFI has a 3.69% expense ratio, which is higher than BEGS's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

RDFI vs. BEGS - Dividend Comparison

RDFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.30%, less than BEGS's 82.09% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	82.09%	48.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF	8.30%	8.17%	8.14%	7.38%	4.70%	6.78%	1.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RDFI and BEGS in my portfolio?

RDFI and BEGS have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RDFI or BEGS?

BEGS has higher volatility (16.14%) compared to RDFI (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RDFI dropped -23.71% vs BEGS's -60.23%.

Which ETF is better, RDFI or BEGS?

On 1-year performance, RDFI leads with 6.26% vs -37.63% for BEGS. On fees, BEGS is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, RDFI has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RDFI or BEGS?

Over the 1-year period, RDFI has performed better with a 6.26% return vs -37.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RDFI or BEGS?

BEGS is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 3.69% for RDFI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RDFI or BEGS?

BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 82.09%, compared with 8.30% for RDFI.

What is the main difference between RDFI and BEGS?

RDFI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while BEGS is Leveraged Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 3.69% for RDFI and 0.99% for BEGS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.