BEGS vs. UXRP
BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) and UXRP (ProShares Ultra XRP ETF) are both Leveraged Cryptocurrency funds. BEGS is actively managed, while UXRP is passively managed. Over the past year, BEGS returned -37.63% vs -94.69% for UXRP. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. BEGS charges 0.99%/yr vs 1.67%/yr for UXRP.
Performance
BEGS vs. UXRP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BEGS achieves a -41.25% return, which is significantly higher than UXRP's -77.99% return.
BEGS
- 1D
- -4.44%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- 6M
- -44.88%
- YTD
- -41.25%
- 1Y
- -37.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -15.83%
UXRP
- 1D
- -5.41%
- 1M
- -7.09%
- 6M
- -74.16%
- YTD
- -77.99%
- 1Y
- -94.69%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -94.38%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $33.85K | $70.66K | $58.45K | |
| $852.19K | $746.96K | $1.32M |
BEGS vs. UXRP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF | -41.25% | 4.72% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | -77.99% | -77.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between BEGS and UXRP is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | 0.77 |
The correlation between BEGS and UXRP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BEGS vs. UXRP — Risk / Return Rank
BEGS
UXRP
BEGS vs. UXRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) and ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BEGS | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 0.79 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.65 | -0.99 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.21 | -1.23 | +0.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BEGS vs. UXRP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BEGS drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, smaller than the maximum UXRP drawdown of -96.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEGS and UXRP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BEGS | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.23% | -96.60% | +36.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -60.23% | -95.74% | +35.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.47% | -96.51% | +40.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.76% | -74.97% | +54.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.21% | 76.79% | -44.58% |
Volatility
BEGS vs. UXRP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) is 16.14%, while ProShares Ultra XRP ETF (UXRP) has a volatility of 24.70%. This indicates that BEGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UXRP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BEGS | UXRP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.14% | 24.70% | -8.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.59% | 101.23% | -44.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 67.71% | 142.99% | -75.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 63.24% | 143.51% | -80.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 63.24% | 143.51% | -80.27% |
BEGS vs. UXRP - Expense Ratio Comparison
BEGS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than UXRP's 1.67% expense ratio.
Dividends
BEGS vs. UXRP - Dividend Comparison
BEGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.09%, more than UXRP's 0.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF | 82.09% | 48.23% |
UXRP ProShares Ultra XRP ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BEGS and UXRP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UXRP has higher volatility (24.70%) compared to BEGS (16.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEGS dropped -60.23% vs UXRP's -96.60%.
On 1-year performance, BEGS leads with -37.63% vs -94.69% for UXRP. On fees, BEGS is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, BEGS has been the lower-risk option at 16.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BEGS has performed better with a -37.63% return vs -94.69%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BEGS is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.67% for UXRP.
BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 82.09%, compared with 0.02% for UXRP.
They also come from different issuers: Rareview and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEGS and 1.67% for UXRP.
BEGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BEGS and UXRP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer