RDFI vs. CEMB
Compare and contrast key facts about Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB).
RDFI and CEMB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RDFI is an actively managed fund by Rareview Funds. It was launched on Oct 20, 2020. CEMB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the JP Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified. It was launched on Apr 17, 2012.
Performance
RDFI vs. CEMB - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RDFI vs. CEMB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | -1.63% | 9.83% | 13.15% | 8.57% | -17.06% | 12.51% | 8.65% |
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | -0.47% | 8.86% | 5.81% | 8.37% | -12.58% | -0.59% | 4.10% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RDFI achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than CEMB's -0.47% return.
RDFI
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -1.18%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 9.09%
- 5Y*
- 2.89%
- 10Y*
- —
CEMB
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- -0.47%
- 6M
- 0.49%
- 1Y
- 5.50%
- 3Y*
- 6.60%
- 5Y*
- 1.80%
- 10Y*
- 3.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RDFI vs. CEMB - Expense Ratio Comparison
RDFI has a 3.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CEMB's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RDFI vs. CEMB — Risk / Return Rank
RDFI
CEMB
RDFI vs. CEMB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RDFI | CEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.67 | 1.30 | -0.63 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.92 | 1.73 | -0.82 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.29 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 1.85 | -1.11 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.00 | 7.37 | -4.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RDFI | CEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.30 | -0.63 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.32 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.71 | 0.48 | +0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between RDFI and CEMB is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RDFI vs. CEMB - Dividend Comparison
RDFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than CEMB's 5.17% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RDFI Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF | 8.39% | 8.17% | 8.14% | 7.38% | 4.70% | 6.78% | 1.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CEMB iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF | 5.17% | 5.14% | 5.11% | 4.77% | 4.29% | 3.51% | 3.86% | 4.19% | 4.66% | 4.06% | 4.26% | 4.76% |
Drawdowns
RDFI vs. CEMB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RDFI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, which is greater than CEMB's maximum drawdown of -20.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDFI and CEMB.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RDFI | CEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.71% | -20.84% | -2.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.01% | -3.04% | -4.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.71% | -20.48% | -3.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.02% | -2.14% | -3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.34% | -3.69% | -3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 0.76% | +1.20% |
Volatility
RDFI vs. CEMB - Volatility Comparison
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to iShares J.P. Morgan EM Corporate Bond ETF (CEMB) at 1.56%. This indicates that RDFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEMB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RDFI | CEMB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.47% | 1.56% | +2.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.70% | 2.30% | +3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.40% | 4.24% | +4.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.06% | 5.62% | +2.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.96% | 6.40% | +1.56% |