RDFI vs. CCEF

In the year-to-date period, RDFI achieves a 1.72% return, which is significantly lower than CCEF's 2.42% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

RDFI has a 3.69% expense ratio, which is higher than CCEF's 2.74% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current RDFI Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is higher than the CCEF Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDFI and CCEF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

RDFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.47%, more than CCEF's 8.10% yield.

The maximum RDFI drawdown since its inception was -25.42%, which is greater than CCEF's maximum drawdown of -13.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDFI and CCEF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) is 1.61%, while Calamos CEF Income & Arbitrage ETF (CCEF) has a volatility of 3.80%. This indicates that RDFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CCEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.