BEGS vs. ETU

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) and ETU (T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF) are both Leveraged Cryptocurrency funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, BEGS returned -37.63% vs -84.64% for ETU. Their correlation of 0.82 means they have usually moved in the same direction. BEGS charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for ETU.

Performance

BEGS vs. ETU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) and T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEGS achieves a -41.25% return, which is significantly higher than ETU's -71.52% return.

BEGS

• 1D: -4.44%
• 1M: 0.88%
• 6M: -44.88%
• YTD: -41.25%
• 1Y: -37.63%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -15.83%

ETU

• 1D: -6.16%
• 1M: 17.43%
• 6M: -63.60%
• YTD: -71.52%
• 1Y: -84.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -64.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	$33.85K	$70.66K	$58.45K
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF	$268.36K	$336.30K	$484.83K

BEGS vs. ETU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	-41.25%	32.00%
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF	-71.52%	-37.42%

Correlation

The correlation between BEGS and ETU is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025	0.82

The correlation between BEGS and ETU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BEGS vs. ETU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BEGS

BEGS Risk / Return Rank: 4
BEGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
BEGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
BEGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5
BEGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
BEGS Martin Ratio Rank: 3

ETU

ETU Risk / Return Rank: 3
ETU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ETU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
ETU Omega Ratio Rank: 3
ETU Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
ETU Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BEGS vs. ETU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) and T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BEGS	ETU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.58	-0.65	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.52	-1.14	+0.62
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.94	0.87	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.65	-0.92	+0.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.21	-1.20	-0.01

BEGS vs. ETU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.58, which is comparable to the ETU Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEGS and ETU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BEGS vs. ETU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEGS drawdown since its inception was -60.23%, smaller than the maximum ETU drawdown of -95.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEGS and ETU.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEGS	ETU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-60.23%	-95.01%	+34.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-60.23%	-93.91%	+33.68%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-56.47%	-93.07%	+36.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.76%	-65.08%	+44.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.21%	71.86%	-39.65%

Volatility

BEGS vs. ETU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) is 16.14%, while T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF (ETU) has a volatility of 26.16%. This indicates that BEGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEGS	ETU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.14%	26.16%	-10.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.59%	92.92%	-36.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	67.71%	134.09%	-66.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.24%	143.54%	-80.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.24%	143.54%	-80.30%

BEGS vs. ETU - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEGS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ETU's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEGS vs. ETU - Dividend Comparison

BEGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 82.09%, more than ETU's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	82.09%	48.23%	0.00%
ETU T-Rex 2X Long Ether Daily Target ETF	0.01%	0.00%	0.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEGS and ETU in my portfolio?

BEGS and ETU have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BEGS or ETU?

ETU has higher volatility (26.16%) compared to BEGS (16.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEGS dropped -60.23% vs ETU's -95.01%.

Which ETF is better, BEGS or ETU?

On 1-year performance, BEGS leads with -37.63% vs -84.64% for ETU. On fees, ETU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, BEGS has been the lower-risk option at 16.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BEGS or ETU?

Over the 1-year period, BEGS has performed better with a -37.63% return vs -84.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEGS or ETU?

ETU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEGS or ETU?

BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 82.09%, compared with 0.01% for ETU.

What is the main difference between BEGS and ETU?

They also come from different issuers: Rareview and REX Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEGS and 0.95% for ETU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BEGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.58 vs -0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.