BEGS vs. ETHT

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

BEGS (Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF) and ETHT (ProShares Ultra Ether ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BEGS is a Leveraged Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Rareview, while ETHT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Ethereum Index (200%). BEGS is actively managed, while ETHT is passively managed. Over the past year, BEGS returned -22.75% vs -74.56% for ETHT. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BEGS charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.94%/yr for ETHT.

Performance

BEGS vs. ETHT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) and ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEGS achieves a -36.95% return, which is significantly higher than ETHT's -75.59% return.

BEGS

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -23.48%
• YTD: -36.95%
• 6M: -38.54%
• 1Y: -22.75%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETHT

• 1D: 3.16%
• 1M: -33.42%
• YTD: -75.59%
• 6M: -75.81%
• 1Y: -74.56%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BEGS vs. ETHT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	-36.95%	32.00%
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF	-75.59%	-38.94%

Correlation

The correlation between BEGS and ETHT is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2025	0.82

The correlation between BEGS and ETHT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

BEGS vs. ETHT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEGS

BEGS Risk / Return Rank: 6
BEGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
BEGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
BEGS Omega Ratio Rank: 7
BEGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
BEGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5

ETHT

ETHT Risk / Return Rank: 4
ETHT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
ETHT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ETHT Omega Ratio Rank: 5
ETHT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
ETHT Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BEGS vs. ETHT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) and ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BEGS	ETHT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.35	-0.54	+0.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.08	-0.43	+0.36
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	0.95	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.41	-0.80	+0.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.87	-1.14	+0.27

BEGS vs. ETHT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BEGS Sharpe Ratio is -0.35, which is higher than the ETHT Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEGS and ETHT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

BEGS vs. ETHT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEGS drawdown since its inception was -56.16%, smaller than the maximum ETHT drawdown of -96.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEGS and ETHT.

Drawdown Indicators

	BEGS	ETHT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.16%	-96.02%	+39.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-56.16%	-93.92%	+37.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-53.28%	-95.32%	+42.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.84%	-67.63%	+49.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.15%	65.41%	-39.26%

Volatility

BEGS vs. ETHT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF (BEGS) is 20.97%, while ProShares Ultra Ether ETF (ETHT) has a volatility of 39.52%. This indicates that BEGS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	BEGS	ETHT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	20.97%	39.52%	-18.55%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	56.37%	94.60%	-38.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.19%	137.92%	-71.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	63.56%	143.23%	-79.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	63.56%	143.23%	-79.67%

BEGS vs. ETHT - Expense Ratio Comparison

BEGS has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHT's 0.94% expense ratio.

Dividends

BEGS vs. ETHT - Dividend Comparison

BEGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 76.50%, more than ETHT's 19.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BEGS Rareview 2x Bull Cryptocurrency & Precious Metals ETF	76.50%	48.23%	0.00%
ETHT ProShares Ultra Ether ETF	19.46%	4.57%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BEGS and ETHT in my portfolio?

BEGS and ETHT have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, BEGS or ETHT?

ETHT has higher volatility (39.52%) compared to BEGS (20.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BEGS dropped -56.16% vs ETHT's -96.02%.

Which ETF is better, BEGS or ETHT?

On 1-year performance, BEGS leads with -22.75% vs -74.56% for ETHT. On fees, ETHT is cheaper at 0.94% per year. On volatility, BEGS has been the lower-risk option at 20.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, BEGS or ETHT?

Over the 1-year period, BEGS has performed better with a -22.75% return vs -74.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, BEGS or ETHT?

ETHT is cheaper with a 0.94% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BEGS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BEGS or ETHT?

BEGS has the higher dividend yield at 76.50%, compared with 19.46% for ETHT.

What is the main difference between BEGS and ETHT?

BEGS is categorized as Leveraged Cryptocurrency, while ETHT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Rareview and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for BEGS and 0.94% for ETHT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BEGS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.35 vs -0.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.