PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RDFI vs. FPFD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

RDFI vs. FPFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

RDFI vs. FPFD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
RDFI
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
-1.63%9.83%13.15%8.57%-17.06%0.72%
FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF
-0.36%6.46%8.50%10.91%-17.11%1.89%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RDFI achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than FPFD's -0.36% return.


RDFI

1D
2.16%
1M
-5.41%
YTD
-1.63%
6M
-1.18%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
9.09%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*

FPFD

1D
0.39%
1M
-2.02%
YTD
-0.36%
6M
-0.21%
1Y
5.18%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


RDFI vs. FPFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

RDFI has a 3.69% expense ratio, which is higher than FPFD's 0.59% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

RDFI vs. FPFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RDFI
RDFI Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
RDFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDFI Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
RDFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDFI Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

FPFD
FPFD Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FPFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPFD Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
FPFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPFD Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RDFI vs. FPFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) and Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RDFIFPFDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.67

1.47

-0.80

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.92

1.99

-1.07

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.29

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.74

1.59

-0.86

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.00

5.82

-2.82

RDFI vs. FPFD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RDFI Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the FPFD Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RDFI and FPFD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RDFIFPFDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

1.47

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.71

0.30

+0.41

Correlation

The correlation between RDFI and FPFD is 0.53, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

RDFI vs. FPFD - Dividend Comparison

RDFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.39%, more than FPFD's 5.09% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
RDFI
Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF
8.39%8.17%8.14%7.38%4.70%6.78%1.01%
FPFD
Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF
5.09%5.04%4.89%5.09%5.22%1.59%0.00%

Drawdowns

RDFI vs. FPFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RDFI drawdown since its inception was -23.71%, which is greater than FPFD's maximum drawdown of -20.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RDFI and FPFD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


RDFIFPFDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.71%

-20.83%

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.01%

-3.18%

-4.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.02%

-2.29%

-3.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.34%

-7.04%

-0.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.96%

0.87%

+1.09%

Volatility

RDFI vs. FPFD - Volatility Comparison

Rareview Dynamic Fixed Income ETF (RDFI) has a higher volatility of 4.47% compared to Fidelity Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPFD) at 1.35%. This indicates that RDFI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPFD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


RDFIFPFDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.47%

1.35%

+3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.70%

2.08%

+3.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.40%

3.54%

+4.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.06%

5.38%

+2.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.96%

5.38%

+2.58%