RCLVX vs. FYMIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

RCLVX (Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund) and FYMIX (Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 3 years, RCLVX returned 6.22%/yr vs 15.72%/yr for FYMIX. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RCLVX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for FYMIX.

Performance

RCLVX vs. FYMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund (RCLVX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCLVX achieves a 2.31% return, which is significantly lower than FYMIX's 9.38% return.

RCLVX

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 2.31%
• 6M: 2.51%
• 1Y: 8.27%
• 3Y*: 6.22%
• 5Y*: 1.25%
• 10Y*: 2.73%

FYMIX

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: 3.11%
• YTD: 9.38%
• 6M: 10.23%
• 1Y: 23.07%
• 3Y*: 15.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCLVX vs. FYMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
RCLVX Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund	2.31%	8.93%	3.04%	7.61%	-11.41%
FYMIX Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund	9.38%	18.95%	11.09%	16.15%	-15.71%

Correlation

The correlation between RCLVX and FYMIX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2022	0.74

The correlation between RCLVX and FYMIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RCLVX vs. FYMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCLVX

RCLVX Risk / Return Rank: 50
RCLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
RCLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
RCLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
RCLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
RCLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 47

FYMIX

FYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 55
FYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
FYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
FYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCLVX vs. FYMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund (RCLVX) and Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RCLVX	FYMIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	2.21	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	3.10	-0.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.41	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	2.71	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.49	11.73	-2.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RCLVX vs. FYMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCLVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the FYMIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCLVX and FYMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RCLVX	FYMIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	2.21	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.21	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.66	-0.39

Drawdowns

RCLVX vs. FYMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCLVX drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, which is greater than FYMIX's maximum drawdown of -22.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCLVX and FYMIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCLVX	FYMIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.60%	-22.70%	-5.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.81%	-8.80%	+4.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.71%	-12.72%	+6.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-0.69%	+0.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.76%	-5.64%	+1.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	2.03%	-1.11%

Volatility

RCLVX vs. FYMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund (RCLVX) is 1.61%, while Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) has a volatility of 3.60%. This indicates that RCLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FYMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCLVX	FYMIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.61%	3.60%	-1.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.33%	8.88%	-5.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.19%	10.81%	-6.62%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.05%	12.73%	-6.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.64%	12.73%	-7.09%

RCLVX vs. FYMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCLVX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is higher than FYMIX's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCLVX vs. FYMIX - Dividend Comparison

RCLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.62%, more than FYMIX's 3.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FYMIX Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund	3.37%	3.69%	1.84%	1.78%	1.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RCLVX Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund	3.62%	3.62%	2.47%	1.63%	2.16%	6.68%	1.97%	3.27%	3.25%	2.98%	4.74%	11.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCLVX and FYMIX in my portfolio?

RCLVX and FYMIX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RCLVX or FYMIX?

FYMIX has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to RCLVX (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCLVX dropped -28.60% vs FYMIX's -22.70%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FYMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.