FYMIX vs. MAPOX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) and Mairs & Power Balanced Fund (MAPOX).

FYMIX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 9, 2022. MAPOX is managed by Mairs & Power. It was launched on Jan 9, 1961.

Performance

FYMIX vs. MAPOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) and Mairs & Power Balanced Fund (MAPOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FYMIX vs. MAPOX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FYMIX Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund	-4.40%	18.95%	11.09%	16.15%	-15.71%
MAPOX Mairs & Power Balanced Fund	-3.20%	6.61%	9.60%	13.39%	-10.30%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FYMIX achieves a -4.40% return, which is significantly lower than MAPOX's -3.20% return.

FYMIX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: -8.20%
• YTD: -4.40%
• 6M: -1.39%
• 1Y: 14.95%
• 3Y*: 11.31%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MAPOX

• 1D: 0.17%
• 1M: -6.62%
• YTD: -3.20%
• 6M: -3.07%
• 1Y: 3.16%
• 3Y*: 7.65%
• 5Y*: 3.62%
• 10Y*: 6.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FYMIX vs. MAPOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FYMIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MAPOX's 0.69% expense ratio.

MAPOX

Mairs & Power Balanced Fund

FYMIX

Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund

Return for Risk

FYMIX vs. MAPOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FYMIX

FYMIX Risk / Return Rank: 64
FYMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
FYMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FYMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FYMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FYMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

MAPOX

MAPOX Risk / Return Rank: 14
MAPOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
MAPOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
MAPOX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
MAPOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
MAPOX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FYMIX vs. MAPOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) and Mairs & Power Balanced Fund (MAPOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FYMIX	MAPOX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	0.37	+0.76
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.63	0.59	+1.04
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.08	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	0.39	+1.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.25	1.41	+4.84
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FYMIX vs. MAPOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FYMIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is higher than the MAPOX Sharpe Ratio of 0.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FYMIX and MAPOX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FYMIX	MAPOX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	0.37	+0.76
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.61	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.02	+0.40

Correlation

The correlation between FYMIX and MAPOX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FYMIX vs. MAPOX - Dividend Comparison

FYMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.85%, more than MAPOX's 3.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FYMIX Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund	3.85%	3.69%	1.84%	1.78%	1.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MAPOX Mairs & Power Balanced Fund	3.12%	2.90%	2.01%	3.64%	6.96%	3.48%	4.37%	4.58%	5.30%	3.80%	2.96%	4.23%

Drawdowns

FYMIX vs. MAPOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FYMIX drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, smaller than the maximum MAPOX drawdown of -69.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FYMIX and MAPOX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FYMIX	MAPOX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.70%	-69.72%	+47.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.95%	-7.27%	-1.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-21.48%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-24.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.72%	-6.62%	-2.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.83%	-21.25%	+15.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	2.00%	+0.16%

Volatility

FYMIX vs. MAPOX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Sustainable Multi-Asset Fund (FYMIX) has a higher volatility of 4.80% compared to Mairs & Power Balanced Fund (MAPOX) at 2.80%. This indicates that FYMIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAPOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FYMIX	MAPOX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.80%	2.80%	+2.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.07%	5.64%	+2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.20%	10.15%	+3.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.67%	10.42%	+2.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.67%	11.11%	+1.56%