RCLVX vs. RGIYX
Compare and contrast key facts about Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund (RCLVX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX).
RCLVX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Mar 23, 1998. RGIYX is managed by Russell. It was launched on Sep 29, 2010.
Performance
RCLVX vs. RGIYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RCLVX vs. RGIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCLVX Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund | -0.33% | 8.93% | 3.04% | 7.61% | -14.04% | 3.05% | 5.21% | 9.30% | -2.75% | 5.35% |
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund | 9.08% | 20.07% | 9.96% | 6.94% | -2.95% | 12.44% | -3.37% | 27.98% | -9.87% | 18.96% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RCLVX achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than RGIYX's 9.08% return. Over the past 10 years, RCLVX has underperformed RGIYX with an annualized return of 2.61%, while RGIYX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.47% annualized return.
RCLVX
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- 0.63%
- 1Y
- 6.39%
- 3Y*
- 5.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- 2.61%
RGIYX
- 1D
- 0.84%
- 1M
- -2.88%
- YTD
- 9.08%
- 6M
- 10.10%
- 1Y
- 22.44%
- 3Y*
- 13.83%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 8.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RCLVX vs. RGIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
RCLVX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than RGIYX's 0.85% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
RCLVX vs. RGIYX — Risk / Return Rank
RCLVX
RGIYX
RCLVX vs. RGIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund (RCLVX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RCLVX | RGIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.45 | 1.93 | -0.48 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.99 | 2.48 | -0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.39 | -0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 2.77 | -0.94 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.12 | 13.22 | -6.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RCLVX | RGIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45 | 1.93 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.20 | 0.77 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.53 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.53 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between RCLVX and RGIYX is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
RCLVX vs. RGIYX - Dividend Comparison
RCLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.63%, less than RGIYX's 8.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RCLVX Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund | 3.63% | 3.62% | 2.47% | 1.63% | 2.16% | 6.68% | 1.97% | 3.27% | 3.25% | 2.98% | 4.74% | 11.07% |
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund | 8.61% | 9.39% | 5.64% | 2.76% | 3.46% | 17.26% | 7.80% | 15.89% | 9.20% | 11.32% | 6.70% | 5.67% |
Drawdowns
RCLVX vs. RGIYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RCLVX drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, smaller than the maximum RGIYX drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCLVX and RGIYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RCLVX | RGIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.60% | -39.17% | +10.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.81% | -8.43% | +4.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.23% | -20.19% | +0.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.23% | -39.17% | +19.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.86% | -3.22% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.78% | -4.70% | +0.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.98% | 1.77% | -0.79% |
Volatility
RCLVX vs. RGIYX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund (RCLVX) is 2.03%, while Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) has a volatility of 4.08%. This indicates that RCLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RGIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RCLVX | RGIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 4.08% | -2.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.85% | 6.98% | -4.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.76% | 12.04% | -7.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.02% | 13.45% | -7.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.61% | 15.90% | -10.29% |