RCLVX vs. RALVX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

RCLVX (Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund) and RALVX (Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Russell. Over the past 10 years, RCLVX returned 2.79%/yr vs 8.67%/yr for RALVX. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RCLVX charges 0.67%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for RALVX.

Performance

RCLVX vs. RALVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund (RCLVX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RCLVX achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly lower than RALVX's 9.05% return. Over the past 10 years, RCLVX has underperformed RALVX with an annualized return of 2.79%, while RALVX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.67% annualized return.

RCLVX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 2.53%
• 6M: 2.53%
• 1Y: 7.90%
• 3Y*: 6.30%
• 5Y*: 1.39%
• 10Y*: 2.79%

RALVX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 1.00%
• YTD: 9.05%
• 6M: 8.47%
• 1Y: 21.63%
• 3Y*: 15.52%
• 5Y*: 8.01%
• 10Y*: 8.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RCLVX vs. RALVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
RCLVX Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund	2.53%	8.93%	3.04%	7.61%	-14.04%	3.05%	5.21%	9.30%	-2.75%	5.35%
RALVX Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund	9.05%	17.44%	11.36%	17.18%	-16.76%	17.82%	6.13%	15.33%	-7.92%	13.55%

Correlation

The correlation between RCLVX and RALVX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.72
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.72
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999	0.78

The correlation between RCLVX and RALVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

RCLVX vs. RALVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RCLVX

RCLVX Risk / Return Rank: 47
RCLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 49
RCLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
RCLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
RCLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
RCLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

RALVX

RALVX Risk / Return Rank: 63
RALVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
RALVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
RALVX Omega Ratio Rank: 64
RALVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
RALVX Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RCLVX vs. RALVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund (RCLVX) and Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	RCLVX	RALVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	2.18	-0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.75	3.03	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.40	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.17	2.77	-0.59
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.91	12.14	-3.23

RCLVX vs. RALVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RCLVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is comparable to the RALVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RCLVX and RALVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

RCLVX vs. RALVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RCLVX drawdown since its inception was -28.60%, smaller than the maximum RALVX drawdown of -59.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RCLVX and RALVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	RCLVX	RALVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.60%	-59.59%	+30.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.81%	-8.16%	+4.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.71%	-13.71%	+7.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.23%	-24.35%	+5.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.23%	-30.08%	+10.85%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.32%	-0.63%	+0.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.75%	-13.23%	+9.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.93%	1.86%	-0.93%

Volatility

RCLVX vs. RALVX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund (RCLVX) is 1.57%, while Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund (RALVX) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that RCLVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RALVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RCLVX	RALVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.57%	3.94%	-2.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.55%	8.51%	-4.96%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.34%	10.38%	-6.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.08%	13.26%	-7.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.65%	13.71%	-8.06%

RCLVX vs. RALVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RCLVX has a 0.67% expense ratio, which is lower than RALVX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

RCLVX vs. RALVX - Dividend Comparison

RCLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than RALVX's 10.70% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RALVX Russell Investments LifePoints Growth Strategy Fund	10.70%	11.68%	2.31%	1.21%	4.20%	17.98%	0.54%	6.24%	7.01%	5.99%	4.79%	1.23%
RCLVX Russell Investments LifePoints Conservative Strategy Fund	3.61%	3.62%	2.47%	1.63%	2.16%	6.68%	1.97%	3.27%	3.25%	2.98%	4.74%	11.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RCLVX and RALVX in my portfolio?

RCLVX and RALVX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RCLVX or RALVX?

RALVX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to RCLVX (1.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RCLVX dropped -28.60% vs RALVX's -59.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RALVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.