RBIL vs. GTIP
Compare and contrast key facts about F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP).
RBIL and GTIP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. RBIL is a passively managed fund by F/m that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Ultrashort TIPS 1-13 Months Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2025. GTIP is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the FTSE Goldman Sachs Treasury Inflation Protected USD Bond Index. It was launched on Oct 2, 2018. Both RBIL and GTIP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
RBIL vs. GTIP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
RBIL vs. GTIP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 1.49% | 2.91% |
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 0.48% | 3.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RBIL achieves a 1.49% return, which is significantly higher than GTIP's 0.48% return.
RBIL
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 0.83%
- YTD
- 1.49%
- 6M
- 2.00%
- 1Y
- 3.59%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GTIP
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 0.48%
- 6M
- 0.21%
- 1Y
- 2.85%
- 3Y*
- 3.05%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
RBIL vs. GTIP - Expense Ratio Comparison
RBIL has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than GTIP's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
RBIL vs. GTIP — Risk / Return Rank
RBIL
GTIP
RBIL vs. GTIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) and Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RBIL | GTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.46 | 0.71 | +2.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.46 | 1.00 | +4.46 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | 1.13 | +0.77 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.45 | 1.02 | +6.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 32.50 | 3.04 | +29.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RBIL | GTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.46 | 0.71 | +2.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.22 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.89 | 0.54 | +3.35 |
Correlation
The correlation between RBIL and GTIP is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
RBIL vs. GTIP - Dividend Comparison
RBIL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than GTIP's 3.89% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RBIL F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF | 4.43% | 3.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GTIP Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF | 3.89% | 4.58% | 3.52% | 2.77% | 6.47% | 3.82% | 1.04% | 2.34% | 0.66% |
Drawdowns
RBIL vs. GTIP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RBIL drawdown since its inception was -0.50%, smaller than the maximum GTIP drawdown of -14.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RBIL and GTIP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| RBIL | GTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -14.31% | +13.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.50% | -2.86% | +2.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -14.31% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.24% | -1.36% | +1.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -4.32% | +4.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.11% | 0.96% | -0.85% |
Volatility
RBIL vs. GTIP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for F/m Ultrashort Treasury Inflation-Protected Security (TIPS) ETF (RBIL) is 0.61%, while Goldman Sachs Access Inflation Protected USD Bond ETF (GTIP) has a volatility of 1.42%. This indicates that RBIL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GTIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| RBIL | GTIP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.61% | 1.42% | -0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.69% | 2.33% | -1.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.05% | 4.03% | -2.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.04% | 6.08% | -5.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.04% | 6.06% | -5.02% |