PortfoliosLab logo
LECO vs. CSL
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between LECO and CSL is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

LECO vs. CSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

LECO:

-0.28

CSL:

-0.02

Sortino Ratio

LECO:

-0.23

CSL:

0.14

Omega Ratio

LECO:

0.97

CSL:

1.02

Calmar Ratio

LECO:

-0.31

CSL:

-0.05

Martin Ratio

LECO:

-0.70

CSL:

-0.09

Ulcer Index

LECO:

15.10%

CSL:

16.61%

Daily Std Dev

LECO:

34.24%

CSL:

30.84%

Max Drawdown

LECO:

-68.89%

CSL:

-64.58%

Current Drawdown

LECO:

-20.21%

CSL:

-14.63%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

LECO:

$11.33B

CSL:

$17.67B

EPS

LECO:

$8.32

CSL:

$17.96

PE Ratio

LECO:

24.40

CSL:

22.75

PEG Ratio

LECO:

1.56

CSL:

1.20

PS Ratio

LECO:

2.81

CSL:

3.53

PB Ratio

LECO:

8.25

CSL:

8.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

LECO:

$4.03B

CSL:

$5.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

LECO:

$1.47B

CSL:

$1.85B

EBITDA (TTM)

LECO:

$739.44M

CSL:

$1.30B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LECO achieves a 8.72% return, which is significantly lower than CSL's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, LECO has underperformed CSL with an annualized return of 13.48%, while CSL has yielded a comparatively higher 16.71% annualized return.


LECO

YTD

8.72%

1M

14.45%

6M

-0.71%

1Y

-9.17%

5Y*

22.98%

10Y*

13.48%

CSL

YTD

11.06%

1M

15.63%

6M

-8.02%

1Y

-1.45%

5Y*

30.45%

10Y*

16.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

LECO vs. CSL — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LECO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LECO is 3131
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LECO is 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LECO is 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LECO is 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LECO is 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LECO is 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

CSL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CSL is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CSL is 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CSL is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CSL is 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CSL is 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CSL is 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

LECO vs. CSL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current LECO Sharpe Ratio is -0.28, which is lower than the CSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LECO and CSL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

LECO vs. CSL - Dividend Comparison

LECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, more than CSL's 0.73% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
LECO
Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.
1.44%1.54%1.21%1.61%1.50%1.70%1.96%2.08%1.57%1.71%2.29%1.42%
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
0.73%1.00%1.02%1.09%0.86%1.31%1.11%1.53%1.27%1.18%1.24%1.04%

Drawdowns

LECO vs. CSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LECO drawdown since its inception was -68.89%, which is greater than CSL's maximum drawdown of -64.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LECO and CSL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

LECO vs. CSL - Volatility Comparison

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) has a higher volatility of 9.93% compared to Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) at 7.54%. This indicates that LECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

LECO vs. CSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


600.00M800.00M1.00B1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B20212022202320242025
1.00B
1.10B
(LECO) Total Revenue
(CSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

LECO vs. CSL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

26.0%28.0%30.0%32.0%34.0%36.0%38.0%20212022202320242025
36.4%
35.2%
(LECO) Gross Margin
(CSL) Gross Margin
LECO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 365.45M and revenue of 1.00B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 36.4%.

CSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 385.70M and revenue of 1.10B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.2%.

LECO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 164.92M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.4%.

CSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 183.60M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.8%.

LECO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 118.49M and revenue of 1.00B, resulting in a net margin of 11.8%.

CSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 143.30M and revenue of 1.10B, resulting in a net margin of 13.1%.