LECO vs. CSL
Compare and contrast key facts about Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: LECO or CSL.
Key characteristics
| LECO | CSL | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 5.82% | 31.07% |
| 1Y Return | 37.36% | 96.14% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 21.57% | 29.79% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 24.68% | 26.15% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 15.23% | 18.70% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.62 | 3.50 |
| Daily Std Dev | 22.89% | 27.16% |
| Max Drawdown | -68.89% | -64.58% |
| Current Drawdown | -11.19% | 0.00% |
Fundamentals
| LECO | CSL | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $12.69B | $18.97B |
| EPS | $9.43 | $16.14 |
| PE Ratio | 23.64 | 24.69 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.09 | 1.33 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.13B | $4.79B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.28B | $2.16B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $798.63M | $1.27B |
Correlation
The correlation between LECO and CSL is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
LECO vs. CSL - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, LECO achieves a 5.82% return, which is significantly lower than CSL's 31.07% return. Over the past 10 years, LECO has underperformed CSL with an annualized return of 15.23%, while CSL has yielded a comparatively higher 18.70% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
LECO vs. CSL - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
LECO vs. CSL - Dividend Comparison
LECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than CSL's 0.81% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LECO Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. | 1.18% | 1.21% | 1.61% | 1.50% | 1.70% | 1.96% | 2.08% | 1.57% | 1.71% | 2.29% | 1.42% | 1.16% |
CSL Carlisle Companies Incorporated | 0.81% | 1.02% | 1.09% | 0.86% | 1.31% | 1.11% | 1.53% | 1.27% | 1.18% | 1.24% | 1.04% | 1.06% |
Drawdowns
LECO vs. CSL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LECO drawdown since its inception was -68.89%, which is greater than CSL's maximum drawdown of -64.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LECO and CSL. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
LECO vs. CSL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) is 7.01%, while Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) has a volatility of 8.00%. This indicates that LECO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
LECO vs. CSL - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities