LECO vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

LECO (Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, LECO returned 17.53%/yr vs 15.65%/yr for VOO. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

LECO vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, LECO achieves a 6.45% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 11.69% return. Over the past 10 years, LECO has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 17.53%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.65% annualized return.

LECO

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: -4.50%
• YTD: 6.45%
• 6M: 7.79%
• 1Y: 35.08%
• 3Y*: 13.40%
• 5Y*: 16.09%
• 10Y*: 17.53%

VOO

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 5.39%
• YTD: 11.69%
• 6M: 12.11%
• 1Y: 29.68%
• 3Y*: 22.73%
• 5Y*: 14.26%
• 10Y*: 15.65%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

LECO vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
LECO Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.	6.45%	29.63%	-12.55%	52.61%	5.42%	21.89%	22.97%	25.41%	-12.24%	21.37%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	11.69%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between LECO and VOO is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.47
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2010	0.65

The correlation between LECO and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

LECO vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LECO

LECO Risk / Return Rank: 74
LECO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
LECO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
LECO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
LECO Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
LECO Martin Ratio Rank: 73

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 75
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 76
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

LECO vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	LECO	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.33	2.53	-1.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	3.43	-1.38
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.46	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	3.42	-1.77
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.53	15.95	-11.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

LECO vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current LECO Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is lower than the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of LECO and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	LECO	VOO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.33	2.53	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61	0.85	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.64	0.87	-0.23
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	0.89	-0.47

Drawdowns

LECO vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum LECO drawdown since its inception was -68.89%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LECO and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	LECO	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.89%	-33.99%	-34.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-20.09%	-8.90%	-11.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.29%	-18.69%	-15.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-34.29%	-24.52%	-9.77%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.89%	-33.99%	-4.90%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.65%	0.00%	-14.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.51%	-3.69%	-9.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.31%	1.91%	+5.40%

Volatility

LECO vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. (LECO) has a higher volatility of 7.27% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 2.74%. This indicates that LECO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	LECO	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.27%	2.74%	+4.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.77%	8.88%	+10.89%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.52%	11.78%	+14.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.54%	16.81%	+9.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.39%	18.01%	+9.38%

Dividends

LECO vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

LECO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.21%, more than VOO's 1.02% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LECO Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc.	1.21%	1.27%	1.54%	1.21%	1.61%	1.50%	1.70%	1.96%	2.08%	1.57%	1.71%	2.29%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.02%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both LECO and VOO in my portfolio?

LECO and VOO have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, LECO or VOO?

LECO has higher volatility (7.27%) compared to VOO (2.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, LECO dropped -68.89% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.