PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAFE vs. MGC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAFE vs. MGC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAFE achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly higher than MGC's 10.80% return.


RAFE

1D
-0.44%
1M
7.15%
YTD
13.35%
6M
14.11%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
19.54%
5Y*
10.73%
10Y*

MGC

1D
-0.79%
1M
5.59%
YTD
10.80%
6M
10.75%
1Y
29.68%
3Y*
23.87%
5Y*
14.70%
10Y*
16.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAFE vs. MGC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
13.35%17.60%13.81%18.80%-13.76%30.16%5.29%0.55%
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
10.80%19.31%27.16%29.77%-19.95%27.58%21.57%0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between RAFE and MGC is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.82

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019

0.85

The correlation between RAFE and MGC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

RAFE vs. MGC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RAFE
MGC

Technology

29.8%
39.3%

Healthcare

23.1%
8.9%

Financial Services

13.3%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
4.8%

Communication Services

7.2%
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
10.1%

Industrials

5.0%
6.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
1.2%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.0%

Utilities

0.6%
1.0%

Energy

-

2.6%

Technology

RAFE
29.8%
MGC
39.3%

Healthcare

RAFE
23.1%
MGC
8.9%

Financial Services

RAFE
13.3%
MGC
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

RAFE
7.7%
MGC
4.8%

Communication Services

RAFE
7.2%
MGC
13.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RAFE
6.5%
MGC
10.1%

Industrials

RAFE
5.0%
MGC
6.5%

Basic Materials

RAFE
4.2%
MGC
1.2%

Real Estate

RAFE
2.7%
MGC
1.0%

Utilities

RAFE
0.6%
MGC
1.0%

Energy

RAFE

-

MGC
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAFE vs. MGC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAFE
RAFE Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
RAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

MGC
MGC Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
MGC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MGC Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
MGC Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
MGC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
MGC Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAFE vs. MGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAFEMGCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.43

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.22

3.03

+1.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.49

13.61

+2.88

RAFE vs. MGC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAFE Sharpe Ratio is 2.78, which is comparable to the MGC Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAFE and MGC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAFEMGCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.78

2.42

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.86

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.60

+0.05

Drawdowns

RAFE vs. MGC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAFE drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, smaller than the maximum MGC drawdown of -51.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAFE and MGC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAFEMGCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-51.93%

+16.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-9.85%

+2.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

-19.28%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.28%

-25.74%

+1.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-0.79%

+0.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-7.06%

+0.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

2.19%

-0.28%

Volatility

RAFE vs. MGC - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and Vanguard Mega Cap ETF (MGC) have volatilities of 2.90% and 3.04%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAFEMGCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.90%

3.04%

-0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.25%

9.27%

-1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.34%

12.32%

-0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.09%

17.27%

-2.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.43%

18.21%

+1.22%

RAFE vs. MGC - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAFE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than MGC's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAFE vs. MGC - Dividend Comparison

RAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.50%, more than MGC's 0.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MGC
Vanguard Mega Cap ETF
0.87%0.93%1.15%1.35%1.65%1.17%1.45%1.81%2.10%1.83%2.14%2.11%
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
1.50%1.67%1.79%1.81%2.22%1.42%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAFE and MGC have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MGC has higher volatility (3.04%) compared to RAFE (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAFE dropped -35.74% vs MGC's -51.93%.

On 5-year performance, MGC leads with 14.70% vs 10.73% for RAFE. On fees, MGC is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, RAFE has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, MGC has performed better with a 14.70% return vs 10.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

MGC is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAFE.

RAFE has the higher dividend yield at 1.50%, compared with 0.87% for MGC.

RAFE tracks RAFI ESG US Index, while MGC tracks CRSP US Mega Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAFE and 0.05% for MGC.

RAFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.78 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAFE and MGC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer