PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAFE vs. FNDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAFE vs. FNDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAFE achieves a 13.86% return, which is significantly lower than FNDX's 14.72% return.


RAFE

1D
0.94%
1M
6.78%
YTD
13.86%
6M
15.30%
1Y
33.02%
3Y*
19.71%
5Y*
10.92%
10Y*

FNDX

1D
0.52%
1M
3.39%
YTD
14.72%
6M
15.53%
1Y
33.33%
3Y*
20.96%
5Y*
12.94%
10Y*
14.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAFE vs. FNDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
13.86%17.60%13.81%18.80%-13.76%30.16%5.29%0.55%
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
14.72%16.94%16.77%18.23%-6.92%31.73%9.12%0.76%

Correlation

The correlation between RAFE and FNDX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2019

0.94

The correlation between RAFE and FNDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

RAFE vs. FNDX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
RAFE
FNDX

Technology

29.8%
19.1%

Healthcare

23.1%
12.0%

Financial Services

13.3%
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
7.4%

Communication Services

7.2%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.5%
9.2%

Industrials

5.0%
9.3%

Basic Materials

4.2%
3.7%

Real Estate

2.7%
1.8%

Utilities

0.6%
3.2%

Energy

-

10.3%

Technology

RAFE
29.8%
FNDX
19.1%

Healthcare

RAFE
23.1%
FNDX
12.0%

Financial Services

RAFE
13.3%
FNDX
14.1%

Consumer Defensive

RAFE
7.7%
FNDX
7.4%

Communication Services

RAFE
7.2%
FNDX
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

RAFE
6.5%
FNDX
9.2%

Industrials

RAFE
5.0%
FNDX
9.3%

Basic Materials

RAFE
4.2%
FNDX
3.7%

Real Estate

RAFE
2.7%
FNDX
1.8%

Utilities

RAFE
0.6%
FNDX
3.2%

Energy

RAFE

-

FNDX
10.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAFE vs. FNDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAFE
RAFE Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
RAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FNDX
FNDX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FNDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNDX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FNDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNDX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAFE vs. FNDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


RAFEFNDXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.93

3.28

-0.35

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.06

4.59

-0.52

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.60

-0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

5.55

-1.13

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.30

21.77

-4.48

RAFE vs. FNDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAFE Sharpe Ratio is 2.93, which is comparable to the FNDX Sharpe Ratio of 3.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAFE and FNDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


RAFEFNDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.93

3.28

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

0.86

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.65

0.79

-0.14

Drawdowns

RAFE vs. FNDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAFE drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, smaller than the maximum FNDX drawdown of -37.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAFE and FNDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAFEFNDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-37.72%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-6.06%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

-16.30%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.28%

-19.06%

-5.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-3.55%

-2.67%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.91%

1.55%

+0.36%

Volatility

RAFE vs. FNDX - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) has a higher volatility of 3.01% compared to Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF (FNDX) at 2.37%. This indicates that RAFE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAFEFNDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.01%

2.37%

+0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.27%

7.27%

+1.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.33%

10.21%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.08%

15.18%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.44%

17.50%

+1.94%

RAFE vs. FNDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAFE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FNDX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAFE vs. FNDX - Dividend Comparison

RAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.49%, more than FNDX's 1.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNDX
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company Index ETF
1.45%1.63%1.76%1.82%2.07%1.64%2.29%2.23%2.40%1.86%2.01%2.01%
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
1.49%1.67%1.79%1.81%2.22%1.42%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, RAFE and FNDX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

RAFE has higher volatility (3.01%) compared to FNDX (2.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAFE dropped -35.74% vs FNDX's -37.72%.

On 5-year performance, FNDX leads with 12.94% vs 10.92% for RAFE. On fees, FNDX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FNDX has been the lower-risk option at 2.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FNDX has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 10.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FNDX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAFE.

RAFE has the higher dividend yield at 1.49%, compared with 1.45% for FNDX.

RAFE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while FNDX is Large Cap Value Equities. RAFE tracks RAFI ESG US Index, while FNDX tracks RAFI Fundamental High Liquidity US Large Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAFE and 0.25% for FNDX.

FNDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.28 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAFE and FNDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer