PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
RAFE vs. SCHB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

RAFE vs. SCHB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAFE achieves a 17.29% return, which is significantly higher than SCHB's 12.19% return.


RAFE

1D
0.52%
1M
1.64%
6M
14.11%
YTD
17.29%
1Y
32.43%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.75%

SCHB

1D
1.46%
1M
1.39%
6M
9.85%
YTD
12.19%
1Y
23.51%
3Y*
20.39%
5Y*
12.10%
10Y*
14.64%
ALL TIME*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$455.18K$476.38K$608.93K
$205.94M$197.35M$256.94M

RAFE vs. SCHB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
17.29%17.60%13.81%18.80%-13.76%30.16%5.29%0.43%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
12.19%16.94%23.93%26.16%-19.46%25.84%20.76%1.12%

Correlation

The correlation between RAFE and SCHB is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2019

0.88

The correlation between RAFE and SCHB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

RAFE vs. SCHB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

RAFE
RAFE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
RAFE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RAFE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
RAFE Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
RAFE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
RAFE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHB
SCHB Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
SCHB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHB Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHB Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHB Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHB Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

RAFE vs. SCHB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) and Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


RAFESCHBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.32

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

2.65

+1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.37

11.36

+6.01

RAFE vs. SCHB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAFE Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is higher than the SCHB Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAFE and SCHB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

RAFE vs. SCHB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAFE drawdown since its inception was -35.74%, roughly equal to the maximum SCHB drawdown of -35.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAFE and SCHB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


RAFESCHBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.74%

-35.27%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.46%

-8.91%

+1.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.36%

-19.34%

+2.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.28%

-25.41%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.45%

0.00%

-0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.08%

-4.09%

-1.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

2.08%

-0.21%

Volatility

RAFE vs. SCHB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF (RAFE) is 2.99%, while Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF (SCHB) has a volatility of 3.76%. This indicates that RAFE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


RAFESCHBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.99%

3.76%

-0.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.71%

10.37%

-1.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.39%

13.10%

-1.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.05%

17.37%

-2.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.27%

18.33%

+0.94%

RAFE vs. SCHB - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAFE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHB's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

RAFE vs. SCHB - Dividend Comparison

RAFE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, more than SCHB's 1.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RAFE
PIMCO RAFI ESG U.S. ETF
1.47%1.67%1.79%1.81%2.22%1.42%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
1.03%1.11%1.24%1.40%1.61%1.21%1.63%1.80%2.00%1.65%1.86%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


RAFE and SCHB have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHB has higher volatility (3.76%) compared to RAFE (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAFE dropped -35.74% vs SCHB's -35.27%.

On 5-year performance, SCHB leads with 12.10% vs 11.73% for RAFE. On fees, SCHB is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, RAFE has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SCHB has performed better with a 12.10% return vs 11.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHB is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for RAFE.

RAFE has the higher dividend yield at 1.47%, compared with 1.03% for SCHB.

RAFE tracks RAFI ESG US Index, while SCHB tracks Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for RAFE and 0.03% for SCHB.

RAFE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for RAFE and SCHB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer