RAAX vs. FLTR
RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) and FLTR (VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - RAAX is a Diversified Portfolio fund actively managed by VanEck, while FLTR is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the MVIS US Investment Grade Floating Rate Index. RAAX is actively managed, while FLTR is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, RAAX returned 13.54%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for FLTR. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. RAAX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for FLTR.
Performance
RAAX vs. FLTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, RAAX achieves a 19.15% return, which is significantly higher than FLTR's 1.91% return.
RAAX
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- -1.28%
- YTD
- 19.15%
- 6M
- 19.65%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 22.13%
- 5Y*
- 13.54%
- 10Y*
- —
FLTR
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.46%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 6M
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 5.30%
- 3Y*
- 6.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 3.51%
RAAX vs. FLTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 19.15% | 26.74% | 12.50% | 6.71% | 1.51% | 21.56% | -8.27% | 6.14% | -2.41% |
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 1.91% | 5.22% | 7.38% | 7.41% | 0.74% | 0.55% | 1.44% | 5.70% | -0.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between RAAX and FLTR is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2018 | 0.12 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
RAAX vs. FLTR — Risk / Return Rank
RAAX
FLTR
RAAX vs. FLTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| RAAX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 3.15 | -1.64 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.64 | 16.96 | -11.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.06 | 101.23 | -80.16 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| RAAX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.75 | 6.77 | -4.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.87 | 2.11 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.70 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.53 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
RAAX vs. FLTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum RAAX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, which is greater than FLTR's maximum drawdown of -17.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAX and FLTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| RAAX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.91% | -17.84% | -16.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.62% | -0.31% | -6.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.59% | -1.93% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.55% | -3.06% | -20.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.84% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -0.04% | -2.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.78% | -0.67% | -6.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.77% | 0.05% | +1.72% |
Volatility
RAAX vs. FLTR - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) has a higher volatility of 2.95% compared to VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF (FLTR) at 0.25%. This indicates that RAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| RAAX | FLTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.95% | 0.25% | +2.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.58% | 0.62% | +10.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.60% | 0.79% | +12.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.60% | 2.13% | +13.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.76% | 5.00% | +10.76% |
RAAX vs. FLTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
RAAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTR's 0.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
RAAX vs. FLTR - Dividend Comparison
RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than FLTR's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLTR VanEck Vectors Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF | 4.73% | 4.97% | 5.93% | 6.07% | 2.29% | 0.63% | 1.49% | 3.05% | 2.67% | 1.69% | 1.16% | 0.71% |
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF | 1.96% | 2.34% | 1.91% | 3.66% | 1.53% | 8.72% | 6.27% | 2.37% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
RAAX and FLTR have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RAAX has higher volatility (2.95%) compared to FLTR (0.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAAX dropped -33.91% vs FLTR's -17.84%.
On 5-year performance, RAAX leads with 13.54% vs 4.49% for FLTR. On fees, FLTR is cheaper at 0.14% per year. On volatility, FLTR has been the lower-risk option at 0.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, RAAX has performed better with a 13.54% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLTR is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for RAAX.
FLTR has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 1.96% for RAAX.
RAAX is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while FLTR is Corporate Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for RAAX and 0.14% for FLTR.
FLTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.77 vs 2.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for RAAX and FLTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer