RAAX vs. LCR

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

RAAX (VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF) and LCR (Leuthold Core ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, RAAX returned 13.60%/yr vs 6.90%/yr for LCR. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. RAAX charges 0.78%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for LCR.

Performance

RAAX vs. LCR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and Leuthold Core ETF (LCR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, RAAX achieves a 18.69% return, which is significantly higher than LCR's 4.45% return.

RAAX

• 1D: 0.73%
• 1M: -1.59%
• YTD: 18.69%
• 6M: 19.93%
• 1Y: 37.37%
• 3Y*: 21.97%
• 5Y*: 13.60%
• 10Y*: —

LCR

• 1D: 0.19%
• 1M: 2.73%
• YTD: 4.45%
• 6M: 5.70%
• 1Y: 14.56%
• 3Y*: 11.43%
• 5Y*: 6.90%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

RAAX vs. LCR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	18.69%	26.74%	12.50%	6.71%	1.51%	21.56%	-9.15%
LCR Leuthold Core ETF	4.45%	12.43%	8.68%	12.80%	-7.58%	12.12%	13.28%

Correlation

The correlation between RAAX and LCR is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.45
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2020	0.59

Over the past year, the correlation between RAAX and LCR has dropped to 0.38 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

RAAX vs. LCR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	RAAX	LCR
Energy	32.6%	8.8%
Industrials	28.6%	6.7%
Basic Materials	17.4%	8.6%
Utilities	13.0%	0.1%
Real Estate	5.0%	-
Technology	1.7%	25.7%
Consumer Cyclical	1.0%	9.4%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	0.5%
Healthcare	0.2%	17.5%
Communication Services	0.1%	6.1%
Financial Services	0.0%	16.7%

Return for Risk

RAAX vs. LCR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RAAX

RAAX Risk / Return Rank: 86
RAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
RAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
RAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
RAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
RAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

LCR

LCR Risk / Return Rank: 56
LCR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
LCR Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
LCR Omega Ratio Rank: 57
LCR Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
LCR Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

RAAX vs. LCR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) and Leuthold Core ETF (LCR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	RAAX	LCR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.76	1.95	+0.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	2.84	+0.74
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.36	+0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.87	2.51	+3.37
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	22.06	10.36	+11.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

RAAX vs. LCR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current RAAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.76, which is higher than the LCR Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of RAAX and LCR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	RAAX	LCR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.76	1.95	+0.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88	0.77	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.75	-0.14

Drawdowns

RAAX vs. LCR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum RAAX drawdown since its inception was -33.91%, which is greater than LCR's maximum drawdown of -17.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for RAAX and LCR.

Drawdown Indicators

	RAAX	LCR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.91%	-17.44%	-16.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.62%	-6.02%	-0.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.59%	-8.59%	-3.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.55%	-13.40%	-10.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.90%	0.00%	-2.90%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.78%	-2.84%	-3.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.76%	1.46%	+0.30%

Volatility

RAAX vs. LCR - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF (RAAX) has a higher volatility of 2.92% compared to Leuthold Core ETF (LCR) at 2.08%. This indicates that RAAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LCR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	RAAX	LCR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.92%	2.08%	+0.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.58%	5.98%	+5.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.63%	7.49%	+6.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.60%	9.02%	+6.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.76%	11.40%	+4.36%

RAAX vs. LCR - Expense Ratio Comparison

RAAX has a 0.78% expense ratio, which is lower than LCR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

RAAX vs. LCR - Dividend Comparison

RAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, more than LCR's 1.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
LCR Leuthold Core ETF	1.31%	1.37%	1.86%	1.60%	0.75%	0.21%	0.62%	0.00%	0.00%
RAAX VanEck Inflation Allocation ETF	1.97%	2.34%	1.91%	3.66%	1.53%	8.72%	6.27%	2.37%	0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both RAAX and LCR in my portfolio?

RAAX and LCR have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, RAAX or LCR?

RAAX has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to LCR (2.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, RAAX dropped -33.91% vs LCR's -17.44%.

Which ETF is better, RAAX or LCR?

On 5-year performance, RAAX leads with 13.60% vs 6.90% for LCR. On fees, RAAX is cheaper at 0.78% per year. On volatility, LCR has been the lower-risk option at 2.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, RAAX or LCR?

Over the 5-year period, RAAX has performed better with a 13.60% return vs 6.90%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, RAAX or LCR?

RAAX is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for LCR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, RAAX or LCR?

RAAX has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 1.31% for LCR.

What is the main difference between RAAX and LCR?

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and The Leuthold Group LLC. Their fees differ too: 0.78% for RAAX and 0.79% for LCR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RAAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.76 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.