QVMS vs. PAMC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QVMS (Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF) and PAMC (Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QVMS is a Multi-factor fund tracking the S&P Small Cap 600, while PAMC is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QVMS returned 14.97%/yr vs 18.46%/yr for PAMC. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QVMS charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for PAMC.

Performance

QVMS vs. PAMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVMS achieves a 15.96% return, which is significantly lower than PAMC's 17.95% return.

QVMS

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 2.44%
• YTD: 15.96%
• 6M: 14.49%
• 1Y: 31.77%
• 3Y*: 14.97%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PAMC

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 17.95%
• 6M: 18.02%
• 1Y: 28.44%
• 3Y*: 18.46%
• 5Y*: 8.58%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QVMS vs. PAMC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF	15.96%	5.56%	9.50%	16.89%	-14.61%	4.45%
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	17.95%	1.54%	26.20%	19.30%	-12.15%	-1.44%

Correlation

The correlation between QVMS and PAMC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2021	0.90

The correlation between QVMS and PAMC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

QVMS vs. PAMC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QVMS	PAMC
Financial Services	18.3%	16.5%
Industrials	16.7%	25.6%
Technology	15.5%	14.1%
Consumer Cyclical	13.2%	12.1%
Healthcare	10.8%	3.4%
Energy	7.5%	10.8%
Real Estate	7.1%	4.1%
Basic Materials	4.5%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	4.2%
Utilities	2.1%	3.1%
Communication Services	1.7%	0.8%

Return for Risk

QVMS vs. PAMC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVMS

QVMS Risk / Return Rank: 59
QVMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
QVMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
QVMS Omega Ratio Rank: 50
QVMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QVMS Martin Ratio Rank: 67

PAMC

PAMC Risk / Return Rank: 50
PAMC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
PAMC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
PAMC Omega Ratio Rank: 44
PAMC Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
PAMC Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVMS vs. PAMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QVMS	PAMC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.55	+0.27
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.67	2.26	+0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.29	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.63	2.79	+0.85
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.26	10.32	+1.94
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QVMS vs. PAMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVMS Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is comparable to the PAMC Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVMS and PAMC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QVMS	PAMC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.82	1.55	+0.27
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.77	-0.44

Drawdowns

QVMS vs. PAMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMS drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, roughly equal to the maximum PAMC drawdown of -27.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMS and PAMC.

Drawdown Indicators

	QVMS	PAMC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.05%	-27.04%	-1.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.78%	-10.24%	+1.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-28.05%	-26.07%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-27.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.75%	0.00%	-0.75%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.10%	-7.47%	-1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	2.76%	-0.16%

Volatility

QVMS vs. PAMC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) is 4.76%, while Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF (PAMC) has a volatility of 5.65%. This indicates that QVMS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QVMS	PAMC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.76%	5.65%	-0.89%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.05%	14.17%	-2.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.62%	18.44%	-0.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.25%	20.40%	+0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.25%	20.73%	+0.52%

QVMS vs. PAMC - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PAMC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

QVMS vs. PAMC - Dividend Comparison

QVMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.13%, more than PAMC's 1.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
PAMC Pacer Lunt MidCap Multi-Factor Alternator ETF	1.10%	1.11%	0.97%	0.69%	1.29%	0.36%	0.30%
QVMS Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF	1.13%	1.10%	1.53%	1.51%	1.58%	0.64%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QVMS and PAMC in my portfolio?

QVMS and PAMC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QVMS or PAMC?

PAMC has higher volatility (5.65%) compared to QVMS (4.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QVMS dropped -28.05% vs PAMC's -27.04%.

Which ETF is better, QVMS or PAMC?

On 3-year performance, PAMC leads with 18.46% vs 14.97% for QVMS. On fees, QVMS is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QVMS has been the lower-risk option at 4.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QVMS or PAMC?

Over the 3-year period, PAMC has performed better with a 18.46% return vs 14.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QVMS or PAMC?

QVMS is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PAMC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QVMS or PAMC?

QVMS has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 1.10% for PAMC.

What is the main difference between QVMS and PAMC?

QVMS is categorized as Multi-factor, while PAMC is Mid Cap Growth Equities. QVMS tracks S&P Small Cap 600, while PAMC tracks Lunt Capital U.S. MidCap Multi-Factor Rotation Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Pacer. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for QVMS and 0.60% for PAMC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QVMS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.