PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QVMS vs. QVML
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

QVMS vs. QVML - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

QVMS vs. QVML - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
QVMS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
4.33%5.56%9.50%16.89%-14.61%4.45%
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
-3.64%17.74%25.87%22.19%-16.25%12.56%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QVMS achieves a 4.33% return, which is significantly higher than QVML's -3.64% return.


QVMS

1D
0.71%
1M
-4.30%
YTD
4.33%
6M
5.31%
1Y
20.53%
3Y*
11.22%
5Y*
10Y*

QVML

1D
0.88%
1M
-4.27%
YTD
-3.64%
6M
-1.37%
1Y
16.19%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QVMS vs. QVML - Expense Ratio Comparison

QVMS has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than QVML's 0.11% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

QVMS vs. QVML — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QVMS
QVMS Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QVMS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVMS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVMS Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
QVMS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVMS Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

QVML
QVML Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QVML Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QVML Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
QVML Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
QVML Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
QVML Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QVMS vs. QVML - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QVMSQVMLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.91

0.88

+0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

1.36

+0.05

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.21

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.40

1.28

+0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.63

6.24

-0.61

QVMS vs. QVML - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QVMS Sharpe Ratio is 0.91, which is comparable to the QVML Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QVMS and QVML, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QVMSQVMLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

0.88

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.66

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between QVMS and QVML is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

QVMS vs. QVML - Dividend Comparison

QVMS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%, more than QVML's 1.14% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
QVMS
Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.26%1.10%1.53%1.51%1.58%0.64%
QVML
Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF
1.14%1.10%1.15%1.43%1.72%0.62%

Drawdowns

QVMS vs. QVML - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QVMS drawdown since its inception was -28.05%, which is greater than QVML's maximum drawdown of -23.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QVMS and QVML.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


QVMSQVMLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.05%

-23.52%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.86%

-12.97%

-1.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.27%

-5.40%

+0.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-5.57%

-3.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

2.66%

+1.03%

Volatility

QVMS vs. QVML - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVMS) has a higher volatility of 6.27% compared to Invesco S&P 500 QVM Multi-factor ETF (QVML) at 5.22%. This indicates that QVMS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QVML based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


QVMSQVMLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.27%

5.22%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

9.19%

+3.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.75%

18.57%

+4.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

16.73%

+4.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.41%

16.73%

+4.68%